Supporting Apache 2 would be fabulous.
Jeff Hitchcock - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Kevin
Gillis
*Sent:* Saturday, December 03, 2005 7:56 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* RE: [IMail Forum] Rollback to 8.2
Hi Joe,
Thanks for the comments.
Ultimately, defects are defects are we need to fix them.
We (Ipswitch) have been running IMail 2006 in our production
environment for over a month now and have not experienced the
configuration and contacts issues that have been reported by some
customers. Now that we know about them and can reproduce them, we
are going to prioritize and fix as part of a release coming soon.
We are processing inquiries/requests/defects in real time and are
scheduling an update for the coming weeks. The items some customers
seem to be experiencing are clustering around folder permissions,
iis configurations and contacts.
Several of us are working this weekend and prioritizing/researching
and fixing issues as they come in. No doubt this is a big
transition (in terms of environmental requirements with .IIS/.net)
and note that we also working to support other http servers (e.g.
apache) as well as make overall folder permissions/iis setup more
automated as part of the install. We're not sure why some of the
permission settings are not being set during the initial
installation but more details soon.
Bye for now,
kg
-----Original Message-----
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of *Joe
Wolf / Internet Specialists, LLC
*Sent:* Saturday, December 03, 2005 3:18 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [IMail Forum] Rollback to 8.2
We've planned our upgrade for tomorrow, but now I'm second
guessing this decision.
I'm not interested in insiders making excuses for Ipswitch
either. What I would like is real information on what problems
exist.
I understand the Mac issue... we knew that one going in.
I'm unclear on the web messaging issue. Is it true that you can
no longer get to the web client by simply entering the official
host name of the mail server: mail.xyz.com and you now have to go
to mail.xyz.com/client ? If this is the case it's a deal breaker
for me. Why anyone would do that is beyond my comprehension.
I really had hopes that Ipswitch was back on the right track, but
it sounds like this is more of the same old stuff if they've
again released a non functional product.
The lame excuses for Ipswitch are BS. They released the product
and it should work as advertised. Period. I am not a beta tester
and don't care to be one.
So I hope this or a new thread can give us the truth about what
are the real changes, what works and what doesn't.
Thanks,
-Joe
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Kenneth Nutt <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*To:* [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Saturday, December 03, 2005 12:31 PM
*Subject:* [IMail Forum] Rollback to 8.2
There seems to be too many issues and bugs with this release.
I have too many domains and too many users to reeducate my
clients. I think my best bet at this point is to roll back to
8.2. I’ve been using Imail since version 6 and have never had
– nor anticipated any major issues like what I many others
have encountered with what seems to be a premature release of
the 2006 version. I did not make a backup of my 8.2
configuration – so is it possible for me to roll back to 8.2
without further damage?
Thanks!
Kenneth
