Here is my 2 cents on what I found.
Intel server Mother boards with built in Intel 10/100 nic's
Running NT with all updates patches and drivers.
I found that the throughput of the nic was not what I expected.
I now have 6 servers with 3 com 3c905's and Intel on boards. The 3 Com
out performs the intel on every NY system.
BUT the same mother board running free BSD the intel is blazing fast.
Tested with ftp's NT to NT and unix to NT and unix to unix.
The intel on NT is always slower than 3com. Go figure.
I reported it to intel many times and got no explanation.
I use the onboard intel's for a back net where there is only low
traffic.
Howard

Rick Davidson wrote:
> 
> I'll chip in another 2 cents,
> I can back up this claim, we use the 3com 905's exclusively, we found the
> Intel nics to be noticably slower.
> 
> Rick Davidson
> Systems Administrator
> Buckeye Internet Services, Ltd.
> The cool thing about technology is that it keeps getting cooler.
> -
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Bad LAN cards (was: iMail is extremely ...)
> 
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Here's my 2 cents on 3Com and Intel NIC's:
> >
> > Our non-scientific tests show that 3Com 905's can outperform current Intel
> > Pro's by about 50%.  Our tests were performed on the same computers by
> > replacing just the NIC's.  We moved large files back and forth on both NT
> > and Novell platforms.  The 3Coms can move the files in 2/3 the time an
> > Intel card would.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Richard
> >
> >
> > At 04:03 PM 1/17/02 -0600, you wrote:
> > >
> > >>The 3-Com 905abc and Intel PRO server cards are flawless.
> > >>Chris
> > >
> > >I think the 3com's are less efficient in CPU burden than Intel's, but I'm
> > >recalling from a very old report.
> > >
> > >Len
> > >
> > >
> > >http://MenAndMice.com/DNS-training
> > >http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : ISC BIND 8.2.4 for NT4 & W2K
> > >http://IMGate.MEIway.com  : Build free, hi-perf, anti-abuse mail gateways
> > >
> > >
> > >Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> > >to be removed from this list.
> > >
> > >An Archive of this list is available at:
> > >http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
> > >
> >
> > Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> > to be removed from this list.
> >
> > An Archive of this list is available at:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
> >
> 
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
> 
> An Archive of this list is available at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

-- 
===========================================================
          DESTEK                     Howard Roemer
                                          CTO 
                                Chief Technology Officer
     HTTP://www.destek.net    The Destek Networking Group
Corporate Wide Area Networking    1 Indian Head Plaza
   Business Internet Access         Nashua NH 03060     
   Virtual Internet Hosting           603.594.9630
          Consulting                FAX: 603.598.8864
                                EMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
============================================================

Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
to be removed from this list.

An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

Reply via email to