Thing is, there have been SO many people upgrading and having problems, I'm unwilling to spend all that money for a seemingly unstable products with lots of upgrade issues.
When I upgrade, it will be to some email product other than Imail. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Guy Isabel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 3:23 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] [OT]NT4 vs Win2000 > Andy wrote: > > > By the sounds of things, since I'm so familiar with NT, I should just > > cleanup what is there, make sure the box is secure, then move everyone > back > > to; and continue to do things the way I have been as I haven't had *any* > > problems with NT4, sp6a, Imail 6.06 and Declude... > > I happen to admin a couple of IMail servers that are running NT4 SP6a and, > yes, the OS is stable enough -- though not as stable (in my experience) as > W2K with the latest SP. However, please consider that there have been > several releases of IMail Server since 6.06, many of them addressing > vulnerabilities. I'd suggest that if you are committed to staying with NT as > the OS, it would be prudent to keep current with IMail > upgrades/patches/hotfixes. Though you may not have had vulnerability issues > with 6.06 so far, they are still there. > > My usual $0.02 (and Canadian at that). > > Guy > > > > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
