> Excuse me.. but why even bother buying the product if all you can do is > host > web pages? Geeze I'll send you a free copy of Apache, which is far > better, > and more secure to host (unlimited) web pages. Sounds to me that the > Micro$oft has a clear and concise licensing structure for there web > edition.. so why even buy it? Don't try to circumvent there licensing / > usage structure because they are not team players.
Rick, this is a discussion of whether or not Imail can be legally used on Windows Server 2003 Web edition. It is not a discussion of the merits of Windows Server 2003 Web edition and IIS 6.0 or any other web server or any comparison between web servers. Yes, Microsoft does have a clear and concise licensing structure for Web Edition. That is why there is such a thing as Web edition in the first place. Would you expect any company to develop and sell a product without a clear and concise intended licensing structure? Trying to circumvent any ones licensing is wrong. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
