I don't need to read the archives because I really don't care if someone runs an unlimited version of Imail on XP Home or not.  I'm not a Microsoft cop and it's none of my business, but I will say that I wouldn't do it.  My comment was simply for those who are the apparent self proclaimed Microsoft software cops that they are trying to dig for technicalities in the Windows 2003 Web Edition License Agreement when such blatant violations such as XP exist, and even approved by Ipswitch. 
 
Run Imail on any Windows flavor you want and it's all fine with me.  I'm running it on Windows 2003 Web Edition and those that want to play cop, judge and jury can continue to do so.  Microsoft is apparently not interested in the entire subject or they would have issued a clarification to the License Agreement by now. 
 
Case closed for me.  Best of luck.
 
-Joe
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 6:10 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Windows Server 2003 Web edition debate.

Uh, Joe, try checking the archives. There has been heated discussion on this forum about running Imail on Windows XP. Some one even tried to run it on Windows XP Home.

 

John Tolmachoff

Engineer/Consultant/Owner

eServices For You

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Wolf
Sent:
Saturday, December 13, 2003 10:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Windows Server 2003 Web edition debate.

 

If we're talking about license violations here then try talking about using Imail on Windows 95, 98, XP, 2000 (not Server) that are not to be used as servers.  They all have built in concurrent connection limits of between 5 and 20 connections, but since Imail is a third party software it gets around this built in limit.  Those here trying to find technical violations of the Windows Server 2003 Web Edition License Agreement with a magnifying glass and can't find any may want to take some time to look at the above product License Agreements.  I haven't read them, but I can't imagine that Imail would be an approved application.

 

-Joe

 

 

 

Reply via email to