|
Uh, Joe, try checking the archives. There has been heated discussion on this forum about running Imail on Windows XP. Some one even tried to run it on Windows XP Home.
John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You
-----Original Message-----
If we're talking about license violations here then try talking about using Imail on Windows 95, 98, XP, 2000 (not Server) that are not to be used as servers. They all have built in concurrent connection limits of between 5 and 20 connections, but since Imail is a third party software it gets around this built in limit. Those here trying to find technical violations of the Windows Server 2003 Web Edition License Agreement with a magnifying glass and can't find any may want to take some time to look at the above product License Agreements. I haven't read them, but I can't imagine that Imail would be an approved application.
-Joe
|
- RE: [IMail Forum] Windows Server 2003 Web editio... Rick Klinge
- RE: [IMail Forum] Windows Server 2003 Web e... John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
- Re: [IMail Forum] Windows Server 2003 W... Mike Biddle
- RE: [IMail Forum] Windows Server 2003 W... Rick Klinge
- RE: [IMail Forum] Windows Server 2003 Web e... Todd Holt
- RE: [IMail Forum] Windows Server 2003 Web editio... Bruce Barnes
- RE: [IMail Forum] Windows Server 2003 Web e... John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
- Re: [IMail Forum] Windows Server 2003 W... Gavin Lawrie
- Re: [IMail Forum] Windows Server 20... Joe Wolf
- Re: [IMail Forum] Windows Serve... John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
- Re: [IMail Forum] Windows ... Joe Wolf
- Re: [IMail Forum] Wind... William Lefkovics
- Re: [IMail Forum] Wind... Alex Artigues
- Re: [IMail Forum] Windows Server 2003 W... Mike Biddle
- Re: [IMail Forum] Windows Server 2003 W... Bill Landry
- [IMail Forum] AOL Communicator Doug Zagha
- RE: [IMail Forum] Windows Server 2003 W... Bruce Barnes
- RE: [IMail Forum] Windows Server 20... John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
- RE: [IMail Forum] Windows Serve... Bruce Barnes
- RE: [IMail Forum] Windows ... Len Conrad
