Thanks, Surajit ji. Pl. see them in 2nd image, which shows their relative size compared to the leaves. -- With regards, J. M. Garg
On Wed, 19 May, 2021, 9:25 pm surajit koley, <[email protected]> wrote: > Again, Sir, the floral chamber(s) in the 3rd pic seems longer and > cylindrical than all the references you have linked. However there might be > some possibility which can not be confirmed without seeing the spadix. > > life is short > time is running out > don't try to know everything > utilize what you already know > > > On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 16:13, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think it may be some Remusatia >> <https://efloraofindia.com/2011/12/09/remusatia/> species as per >> comparative images herein, mostly *Remusatia hookeriana* Schott >> <https://efloraofindia.com/species/a---l/ar/araceae/remusatia/remusatia-hookeriana> >> as >> per details and images herein and as per Flora of China keys >> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=128128>, FoC >> illustrations- one >> <http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=122221&flora_id=2>, >> two <http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=122222&flora_id=2>, >> three >> <http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=122223&flora_id=2> >> and GBIF <https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?taxon_key=2871961> >> specimens - one >> <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/https%3A%2F%2Fquod.lib.umich.edu%2Fcgi%2Fi%2Fimage%2Fapi%2Fimage%2Fherb00ic%3A1489692%3AMICH-V-1489692%2Ffull%2Fres%3A0%2F0%2Fnative.jpg>, >> two <https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/1998711321>, three >> <https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/1998395449>, four >> <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kew.org%2Fherbcatimg%2F616588.jpg> >> >> On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 20:36, surajit koley < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Dear Sawmliana ji, >>> I know I am asking for too much! Please understand that I am no expert >>> on *Alocasia* or *Colocasia*, I am here too to learn something about >>> plant-world. However, I do know what a flower of *A. fornicata* look >>> like. And I believe that identification based on leaf morphology can >>> mislead, specially in case of *Alocasia* or *Colocasia*. >>> >>> I have doubt if your plant can be *Alocasia fornicata* - flowers are >>> not like the ones I see here. >>> I do not know if there can be regional variation. >>> I attach here description of *Alocasia fornicata* from the booh, >>> "Botany of Bihar and Orissa". >>> Also attached an edited picture for your perusal. >>> >>> Thank you. >>> Best regards, >>> Surajit Koley >>> >>> >>> On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 07:16, surajit koley < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Please send me the flower to examine physically. >>>> >>>> Thank you. >>>> Best regards, >>>> Surajit Koley >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, 12 May 2021 at 21:29, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I am not convinced about it being Alocasia *fallax* as per GBIF >>>>> <https://www.gbif.org/species/5329901> specimens or >>>>> *Alocasia decipiens* as per GBIF >>>>> <https://www.gbif.org/species/5329954>. >>>>> What I see here is shining leaves with clear tertiary veins and >>>>> contrasting colours of both sides of the leave, as can be seen in GBIF >>>>> <https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?country=IN&country=TH&country=LK&country=US&country=VN&country=ZZ&taxon_key=5329964> >>>>> specimens >>>>> of Alocasia fornicata at one >>>>> <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kew.org%2Fherbcatimg%2F711058.jpg> >>>>> , two >>>>> <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fn2t.net%2Fark%3A%2F65665%2Fm3dc41e73e-6e95-4bda-9d8c-a948f6944a0f> >>>>> , three >>>>> <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/https%3A%2F%2Fmedialib.naturalis.nl%2Ffile%2Fid%2FL.1415396%2Fformat%2Flarge> >>>>> , four >>>>> <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fn2t.net%2Fark%3A%2F65665%2Fm3c20a6c8e-b68f-4408-9982-5b468ca20148> >>>>> , five >>>>> <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fn2t.net%2Fark%3A%2F65665%2Fm376252f4a-9298-45c5-8c5a-fe20d8152bc8> >>>>> , six >>>>> <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fn2t.net%2Fark%3A%2F65665%2Fm35f65b9c9-43fe-448a-b8dd-c3fe4902abe2>. >>>>> It also have distribution in the area as per POWO >>>>> <http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:84168-1> >>>>> . >>>>> However, I am not sure. >>>>> Pl. confirm or otherwise. >>>>> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>>> From: M Sawmliana <[email protected]> >>>>> Date: Mon, 1 Sept 2014 at 16:59 >>>>> Subject: [efloraofindia:199258] Alocasia sp. for ID (Araceae) >>>>> To: <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Location : Sairang, Mizoram >>>>> Date : 01-09-2014 >>>>> Habit : Herb >>>>> Habitat :Grows wild in shady place >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> With regards, >>>>> M.Sawmliana >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> With regards, >>>>> J.M.Garg >>>>> >>>> >> >> -- >> With regards, >> J.M.Garg >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFBFiA1BgveDegBPrJOFXJMLo0X%3DdP-guY%2BWY3pOJ1wHiA%40mail.gmail.com.

