Thanks, Surajit ji.
Pl. see them in 2nd image, which shows their relative size compared to the
leaves.
--
With regards,
J. M. Garg

On Wed, 19 May, 2021, 9:25 pm surajit koley, <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Again, Sir, the floral chamber(s) in the 3rd pic seems longer and
> cylindrical than all the references you have linked. However there might be
> some possibility which can not be confirmed without seeing the spadix.
>
> life is short
> time is running out
> don't try to know everything
> utilize what you already know
>
>
> On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 16:13, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I think it may be some Remusatia
>> <https://efloraofindia.com/2011/12/09/remusatia/> species as per
>> comparative images herein, mostly *Remusatia hookeriana* Schott
>> <https://efloraofindia.com/species/a---l/ar/araceae/remusatia/remusatia-hookeriana>
>>  as
>> per details and images herein and as per Flora of China keys
>> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=128128>, FoC
>> illustrations- one
>> <http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=122221&flora_id=2>,
>> two <http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=122222&flora_id=2>,
>> three
>> <http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=122223&flora_id=2>
>> and GBIF <https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?taxon_key=2871961>
>> specimens - one
>> <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/https%3A%2F%2Fquod.lib.umich.edu%2Fcgi%2Fi%2Fimage%2Fapi%2Fimage%2Fherb00ic%3A1489692%3AMICH-V-1489692%2Ffull%2Fres%3A0%2F0%2Fnative.jpg>,
>> two <https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/1998711321>, three
>> <https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/1998395449>, four
>> <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kew.org%2Fherbcatimg%2F616588.jpg>
>>
>> On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 20:36, surajit koley <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>   Dear Sawmliana ji,
>>> I know I am asking for too much! Please understand that I am no expert
>>> on *Alocasia* or *Colocasia*, I am here too to learn something about
>>> plant-world. However, I do know what a flower of *A. fornicata* look
>>> like. And I believe that identification based on leaf morphology can
>>> mislead, specially in case of *Alocasia* or *Colocasia*.
>>>
>>> I have doubt if your plant can be *Alocasia fornicata* - flowers are
>>> not like the ones I see here.
>>> I do not know if there can be regional variation.
>>> I attach here description of *Alocasia fornicata* from the booh,
>>> "Botany of Bihar and Orissa".
>>> Also attached an edited picture for your perusal.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>> Best regards,
>>> Surajit Koley
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 07:16, surajit koley <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>   Please send me the flower to examine physically.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Surajit Koley
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 12 May 2021 at 21:29, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I am not convinced about it being Alocasia *fallax* as per GBIF
>>>>> <https://www.gbif.org/species/5329901> specimens or
>>>>> *Alocasia decipiens* as per GBIF
>>>>> <https://www.gbif.org/species/5329954>.
>>>>> What I see here is shining leaves with clear tertiary veins and
>>>>> contrasting colours of both sides of the leave, as can be seen in GBIF
>>>>> <https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?country=IN&country=TH&country=LK&country=US&country=VN&country=ZZ&taxon_key=5329964>
>>>>>  specimens
>>>>> of Alocasia fornicata at one
>>>>> <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kew.org%2Fherbcatimg%2F711058.jpg>
>>>>> , two
>>>>> <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fn2t.net%2Fark%3A%2F65665%2Fm3dc41e73e-6e95-4bda-9d8c-a948f6944a0f>
>>>>> , three
>>>>> <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/https%3A%2F%2Fmedialib.naturalis.nl%2Ffile%2Fid%2FL.1415396%2Fformat%2Flarge>
>>>>> , four
>>>>> <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fn2t.net%2Fark%3A%2F65665%2Fm3c20a6c8e-b68f-4408-9982-5b468ca20148>
>>>>> , five
>>>>> <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fn2t.net%2Fark%3A%2F65665%2Fm376252f4a-9298-45c5-8c5a-fe20d8152bc8>
>>>>> , six
>>>>> <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fn2t.net%2Fark%3A%2F65665%2Fm35f65b9c9-43fe-448a-b8dd-c3fe4902abe2>.
>>>>> It also have distribution in the area as per POWO
>>>>> <http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:84168-1>
>>>>> .
>>>>> However, I am not sure.
>>>>> Pl. confirm or otherwise.
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>>>> From: M Sawmliana <[email protected]>
>>>>> Date: Mon, 1 Sept 2014 at 16:59
>>>>> Subject: [efloraofindia:199258] Alocasia sp. for ID (Araceae)
>>>>> To: <[email protected]>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Location : Sairang, Mizoram
>>>>> Date : 01-09-2014
>>>>> Habit : Herb
>>>>> Habitat :Grows wild in shady place
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> With regards,
>>>>> M.Sawmliana
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> With regards,
>>>>> J.M.Garg
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> With regards,
>> J.M.Garg
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFBFiA1BgveDegBPrJOFXJMLo0X%3DdP-guY%2BWY3pOJ1wHiA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to