Hello Charlie,
Le 16/01/2015 19:37, Charlie Perkins a écrit :
Hello Alex,
Thanks for reviewing the document!
Follow-up below:
On 1/16/2015 10:02 AM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
I am happy the document does not go as far as making a recommendation,
because, sensing the intent, I would disagree with the recommendation.
Reading the document, and thinking what the recommendation could be,
my own comment - IMHO - is to not give up using IP on new-generation
wireless links, but to improve the layers below IP such as to have IP
run unmodified. Second, is to use two radio interfaces on whatever is
called an IP Router. This applies to many current works at IETF.
In fact, I wholeheartedly support using IP over wireless links, new
generation or otherwise. In fact, IP can just as well be used in
routers with a single radio interface, as long as the effects collected
in the document are observed.
There is one point not collected in the document about using
single-interface routers: constant interference, systematic bandwidth
reduction. Such a router systematically repeats on same channel what it
hears there, and bandwidth is systematically dropping.
(this is contrary to the typical random uncontrollable interference
events - here we're sure about it).
Alex
Regards,
Charlie P.
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
