Le 19/01/2015 18:57, Joe Touch a écrit :
On 1/19/2015 9:08 AM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
Le 16/01/2015 21:58, Joe Touch a écrit :
FYI, there's an RFC explaining all this already: 3819
I think this RFC can cover some of the issues raised in this draft,
but it deserves a better treatment of peculiarities of wireless
subnetworks.
There are other relevant BCPs that cover some of these points, e.g.,
3449, 6275, etc.
TCP for assymmetric links and Mobile IP are good suggestions for LLNs.
However, I have never seen them mentioned in these groups - they are
completely overlooked.
A full scan of existing RFCs would help before jumping in and
assuming the IETF hasn't addressed these issues before,
Yes, for example we have ROHC and IP-over-802154 HC, two different things.
But I think we have no RFC warning there's a hidden terminal problem in
WiFi ad-hoc mode, or that radio range (power levels) is a determining
factor.
but certainly where they haven't been issued, new treatment would be
warranted.
I agree.
Alex
Joe
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
