ignore that comment lol. That doesn't exactly clock the gpu itself

On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote:
> SetFSB + PCI-E overclocking?
>
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:16 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Well, I've tried a couple dozen versions just now and it just won't
>> budge an inch when it comes to 945gm. Fatal errors, exceptions, unable
>> to read clocks (it said my gma 950 was at 200mhz, I almost freaked).
>>
>> Given the fact that increasing clocks isn't the way to go, I wonder if
>> there's any resources that might be balanced to feed the gma a bit
>> more, since it's all shared resources and all...
>>
>> On Jun 6, 1:55 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> PowerStrip...ahh~~ that brings back memories ^^
>>> i remember OCing my SiS6326 (if imnot mistaken) to death by burning it's
>>> Core clock.....
>>> but that time i dont know that integrated GPU uses bus driver as it's core
>>> to the CPU bridge..lol...
>>>
>>> but intel 9xx are hard thing to OC...well yeah u can increase it by 50MHz
>>> step..but not too much...heat isnt the issue here, some 9xx doesnt even have
>>> temperature sensors...the bridge  that connects the GPU and CPU also the
>>> memory bus/controller might be damaged and u guess what's gonna happened
>>> next..well, as long as someone willing to experiment for the sake of
>>> discovery, than go ahead ^^ those with celeron CPU, intel 9xx with that CPU
>>> on cant even increase the clock to 400+, intel has pun limiter on some
>>> celeron class chipset, which in my guess that GMA 9xx somewhat to powerful
>>> for the older celeron (mostly single core family) chipset...lol, the
>>> irony...
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 7:09 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > I've read somewhere that you could create a custom 5:4 resolution that
>>> > would act as a middle ground between 800x600 and 1024x768, which are
>>> > both 4:3 whereas the tv is not. If I'm not mistaken I believe it's
>>> > 960x540.
>>>
>>> > On Jun 6, 12:05 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > > an S-video cable
>>>
>>> > > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 6:47 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > > > sure, with hdmi you can go all the way as both the display adapter and
>>> > > > the screen support it, way beyond mere 1080p/i/whatever.
>>> > > > so it goes out from s-video and enters the tv with what connector?
>>>
>>> > > > On Jun 5, 11:37 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > > >> well I heard the max resolution for anyone using a TV via S-Video was
>>> > > >> 1024x768 but the best was 800x600. If you have HDMI, then its 
>>> > > >> probably
>>> > > >> a different story
>>>
>>> > > >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 6:28 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > > >> > you sure it's impossible? it has great custom resolution editing
>>> > > >> > options.
>>>
>>> > > >> > On Jun 5, 11:19 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > > >> >> a few year ago maybe 3 or so. I was messing with PS to try to get
>>> > > >> >> custom resolutions on my TV from S-video (which I hear is
>>> > impossible
>>> > > >> >> anyway)
>>>
>>> > > >> >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 5:56 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > > >> >> > How long ago was it? Because maybe later versions might do the
>>> > trick.
>>>
>>> > > >> >> > On Jun 5, 10:53 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > > >> >> >> I'm somewhat sure I tried to use PS and it couldn't OC the
>>> > 950GMA. I
>>> > > >> >> >> could be wrong though
>>>
>>> > > >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 5:47 PM, hussam aulaian <
>>> > [email protected]> wrote:
>>> > > >> >> >> > i hav searched many people refused since the laptops which 
>>> > > >> >> >> > has
>>> > DDR3 prices
>>> > > >> >> >> > dropped
>>>
>>> > > >> >> >> > --
>>> > > >> >> >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>>
>>> > > >> >> >> --
>>> > > >> >> >> Espionage724 Has A Signature...
>>>
>>> > > >> >> > --
>>> > > >> >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>>
>>> > > >> >> --
>>> > > >> >> Espionage724 Has A Signature...
>>>
>>> > > >> > --
>>> > > >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>>
>>> > > >> --
>>> > > >> Espionage724 Has A Signature...
>>>
>>> > > > --
>>> > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>>
>>> > > --
>>> > > Espionage724 Has A Signature...
>>>
>>> > --
>>> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Espionage724 Has A Signature...
>



-- 
Espionage724 Has A Signature...

-- 
9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS

Reply via email to