http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,1774651~root=ocusa~mode=flat~start=0#1798827
List of PLL manufacturers and their logos

On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote:
> lol, I got a whole 300Mhz more :p i even try sometimes for 400Mhz
>
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:39 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote:
>> If I recall correctly there are at least 8 different vendors for pll
>> chips, ics, cypress, winbond, and these are just the ones I remember.
>> I would raise my hands and praise the heavens if I could just find it
>> and increase not that much, I just wanted 133-233 mhz more.
>>
>> On Jun 6, 2:34 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Most computers come with the same kind of pll chip and it has some
>>> word on it (maybe ICS?) but if it does, then thats the chip most
>>> likely
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > If I recall correctly I think thats what someone said (I have no idea
>>> > what a crystal clock is though)
>>>
>>> > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:30 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> It's right next to the crystal ...clock?, right?
>>>
>>> >> On Jun 6, 2:23 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>> only way I can think of is if you open your computer and look at the 
>>> >>> mobo :/
>>>
>>> >>> I tried googling it, but found nothing.
>>>
>>> >>> Another option is if you could find out the motherboard, you could
>>> >>> maybe try searching that in FCC database maybe? If thats what its
>>> >>> called anyway
>>>
>>> >>> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:21 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>> > But isn't the gpu connected through pci-e? And do you have any idea
>>> >>> > what's the pll of an hp 530 with a 945gme, or a place where I might
>>> >>> > find it?
>>>
>>> >>> > On Jun 6, 2:17 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>> >> ignore that comment lol. That doesn't exactly clock the gpu itself
>>>
>>> >>> >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Espionage724 
>>> >>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>> >> > SetFSB + PCI-E overclocking?
>>>
>>> >>> >> > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:16 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> 
>>> >>> >> > wrote:
>>> >>> >> >> Well, I've tried a couple dozen versions just now and it just 
>>> >>> >> >> won't
>>> >>> >> >> budge an inch when it comes to 945gm. Fatal errors, exceptions, 
>>> >>> >> >> unable
>>> >>> >> >> to read clocks (it said my gma 950 was at 200mhz, I almost 
>>> >>> >> >> freaked).
>>>
>>> >>> >> >> Given the fact that increasing clocks isn't the way to go, I 
>>> >>> >> >> wonder if
>>> >>> >> >> there's any resources that might be balanced to feed the gma a bit
>>> >>> >> >> more, since it's all shared resources and all...
>>>
>>> >>> >> >> On Jun 6, 1:55 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>> >> >>> PowerStrip...ahh~~ that brings back memories ^^
>>> >>> >> >>> i remember OCing my SiS6326 (if imnot mistaken) to death by 
>>> >>> >> >>> burning it's
>>> >>> >> >>> Core clock.....
>>> >>> >> >>> but that time i dont know that integrated GPU uses bus driver as 
>>> >>> >> >>> it's core
>>> >>> >> >>> to the CPU bridge..lol...
>>>
>>> >>> >> >>> but intel 9xx are hard thing to OC...well yeah u can increase it 
>>> >>> >> >>> by 50MHz
>>> >>> >> >>> step..but not too much...heat isnt the issue here, some 9xx 
>>> >>> >> >>> doesnt even have
>>> >>> >> >>> temperature sensors...the bridge  that connects the GPU and CPU 
>>> >>> >> >>> also the
>>> >>> >> >>> memory bus/controller might be damaged and u guess what's gonna 
>>> >>> >> >>> happened
>>> >>> >> >>> next..well, as long as someone willing to experiment for the 
>>> >>> >> >>> sake of
>>> >>> >> >>> discovery, than go ahead ^^ those with celeron CPU, intel 9xx 
>>> >>> >> >>> with that CPU
>>> >>> >> >>> on cant even increase the clock to 400+, intel has pun limiter 
>>> >>> >> >>> on some
>>> >>> >> >>> celeron class chipset, which in my guess that GMA 9xx somewhat 
>>> >>> >> >>> to powerful
>>> >>> >> >>> for the older celeron (mostly single core family) chipset...lol, 
>>> >>> >> >>> the
>>> >>> >> >>> irony...
>>>
>>> >>> >> >>> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 7:09 AM, tribaljet 
>>> >>> >> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>> >> >>> > I've read somewhere that you could create a custom 5:4 
>>> >>> >> >>> > resolution that
>>> >>> >> >>> > would act as a middle ground between 800x600 and 1024x768, 
>>> >>> >> >>> > which are
>>> >>> >> >>> > both 4:3 whereas the tv is not. If I'm not mistaken I believe 
>>> >>> >> >>> > it's
>>> >>> >> >>> > 960x540.
>>>
>>> >>> >> >>> > On Jun 6, 12:05 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> 
>>> >>> >> >>> > wrote:
>>> >>> >> >>> > > an S-video cable
>>>
>>> >>> >> >>> > > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 6:47 PM, tribaljet 
>>> >>> >> >>> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>> >> >>> > > > sure, with hdmi you can go all the way as both the display 
>>> >>> >> >>> > > > adapter and
>>> >>> >> >>> > > > the screen support it, way beyond mere 1080p/i/whatever.
>>> >>> >> >>> > > > so it goes out from s-video and enters the tv with what 
>>> >>> >> >>> > > > connector?
>>>
>>> >>> >> >>> > > > On Jun 5, 11:37 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> 
>>> >>> >> >>> > > > wrote:
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> well I heard the max resolution for anyone using a TV via 
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> S-Video was
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> 1024x768 but the best was 800x600. If you have HDMI, then 
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> its probably
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> a different story
>>>
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 6:28 PM, tribaljet 
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> <[email protected]>
>>> >>> >> >>> > wrote:
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> > you sure it's impossible? it has great custom 
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> > resolution editing
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> > options.
>>>
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> > On Jun 5, 11:19 pm, Espionage724 
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> a few year ago maybe 3 or so. I was messing with PS to 
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> try to get
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> custom resolutions on my TV from S-video (which I hear 
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> is
>>> >>> >> >>> > impossible
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> anyway)
>>>
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 5:56 PM, tribaljet 
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> <[email protected]>
>>> >>> >> >>> > wrote:
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> > How long ago was it? Because maybe later versions 
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> > might do the
>>> >>> >> >>> > trick.
>>>
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> > On Jun 5, 10:53 pm, Espionage724 
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> I'm somewhat sure I tried to use PS and it couldn't 
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> OC the
>>> >>> >> >>> > 950GMA. I
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> could be wrong though
>>>
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 5:47 PM, hussam aulaian <
>>> >>> >> >>> > [email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> > i hav searched many people refused since the 
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> > laptops which has
>>> >>> >> >>> > DDR3 prices
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> > dropped
>>>
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> > --
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>>
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> --
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> Espionage724 Has A Signature...
>>>
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> > --
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>>
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> --
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> Espionage724 Has A Signature...
>>>
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> > --
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>>
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> --
>>> >>> >> >>> > > >> Espionage724 Has A Signature...
>>>
>>> >>> >> >>> > > > --
>>> >>> >> >>> > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>>
>>> >>> >> >>> > > --
>>> >>> >> >>> > > Espionage724 Has A Signature...
>>>
>>> >>> >> >>> > --
>>> >>> >> >>> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>>
>>> >>> >> >> --
>>> >>> >> >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>>
>>> >>> >> > --
>>> >>> >> > Espionage724 Has A Signature...
>>>
>>> >>> >> --
>>> >>> >> Espionage724 Has A Signature...
>>>
>>> >>> > --
>>> >>> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>>
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> Espionage724 Has A Signature...
>>>
>>> >> --
>>> >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>>
>>> > --
>>> > Espionage724 Has A Signature...
>>>
>>> --
>>> Espionage724 Has A Signature...
>>
>> --
>> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Espionage724 Has A Signature...
>



-- 
Espionage724 Has A Signature...

-- 
9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS

Reply via email to