It's right next to the crystal ...clock?, right? On Jun 6, 2:23 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > only way I can think of is if you open your computer and look at the mobo :/ > > I tried googling it, but found nothing. > > Another option is if you could find out the motherboard, you could > maybe try searching that in FCC database maybe? If thats what its > called anyway > > > > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:21 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > But isn't the gpu connected through pci-e? And do you have any idea > > what's the pll of an hp 530 with a 945gme, or a place where I might > > find it? > > > On Jun 6, 2:17 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ignore that comment lol. That doesn't exactly clock the gpu itself > > >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Espionage724 <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > SetFSB + PCI-E overclocking? > > >> > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:16 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Well, I've tried a couple dozen versions just now and it just won't > >> >> budge an inch when it comes to 945gm. Fatal errors, exceptions, unable > >> >> to read clocks (it said my gma 950 was at 200mhz, I almost freaked). > > >> >> Given the fact that increasing clocks isn't the way to go, I wonder if > >> >> there's any resources that might be balanced to feed the gma a bit > >> >> more, since it's all shared resources and all... > > >> >> On Jun 6, 1:55 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> PowerStrip...ahh~~ that brings back memories ^^ > >> >>> i remember OCing my SiS6326 (if imnot mistaken) to death by burning > >> >>> it's > >> >>> Core clock..... > >> >>> but that time i dont know that integrated GPU uses bus driver as it's > >> >>> core > >> >>> to the CPU bridge..lol... > > >> >>> but intel 9xx are hard thing to OC...well yeah u can increase it by > >> >>> 50MHz > >> >>> step..but not too much...heat isnt the issue here, some 9xx doesnt > >> >>> even have > >> >>> temperature sensors...the bridge that connects the GPU and CPU also > >> >>> the > >> >>> memory bus/controller might be damaged and u guess what's gonna > >> >>> happened > >> >>> next..well, as long as someone willing to experiment for the sake of > >> >>> discovery, than go ahead ^^ those with celeron CPU, intel 9xx with > >> >>> that CPU > >> >>> on cant even increase the clock to 400+, intel has pun limiter on some > >> >>> celeron class chipset, which in my guess that GMA 9xx somewhat to > >> >>> powerful > >> >>> for the older celeron (mostly single core family) chipset...lol, the > >> >>> irony... > > >> >>> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 7:09 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> > I've read somewhere that you could create a custom 5:4 resolution > >> >>> > that > >> >>> > would act as a middle ground between 800x600 and 1024x768, which are > >> >>> > both 4:3 whereas the tv is not. If I'm not mistaken I believe it's > >> >>> > 960x540. > > >> >>> > On Jun 6, 12:05 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> > > an S-video cable > > >> >>> > > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 6:47 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > >> >>> > > wrote: > >> >>> > > > sure, with hdmi you can go all the way as both the display > >> >>> > > > adapter and > >> >>> > > > the screen support it, way beyond mere 1080p/i/whatever. > >> >>> > > > so it goes out from s-video and enters the tv with what > >> >>> > > > connector? > > >> >>> > > > On Jun 5, 11:37 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> > > >> well I heard the max resolution for anyone using a TV via > >> >>> > > >> S-Video was > >> >>> > > >> 1024x768 but the best was 800x600. If you have HDMI, then its > >> >>> > > >> probably > >> >>> > > >> a different story > > >> >>> > > >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 6:28 PM, tribaljet > >> >>> > > >> <[email protected]> > >> >>> > wrote: > >> >>> > > >> > you sure it's impossible? it has great custom resolution > >> >>> > > >> > editing > >> >>> > > >> > options. > > >> >>> > > >> > On Jun 5, 11:19 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> > >> >>> > > >> > wrote: > >> >>> > > >> >> a few year ago maybe 3 or so. I was messing with PS to try > >> >>> > > >> >> to get > >> >>> > > >> >> custom resolutions on my TV from S-video (which I hear is > >> >>> > impossible > >> >>> > > >> >> anyway) > > >> >>> > > >> >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 5:56 PM, tribaljet > >> >>> > > >> >> <[email protected]> > >> >>> > wrote: > >> >>> > > >> >> > How long ago was it? Because maybe later versions might do > >> >>> > > >> >> > the > >> >>> > trick. > > >> >>> > > >> >> > On Jun 5, 10:53 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> > >> >>> > > >> >> > wrote: > >> >>> > > >> >> >> I'm somewhat sure I tried to use PS and it couldn't OC the > >> >>> > 950GMA. I > >> >>> > > >> >> >> could be wrong though > > >> >>> > > >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 5:47 PM, hussam aulaian < > >> >>> > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> > > >> >> >> > i hav searched many people refused since the laptops > >> >>> > > >> >> >> > which has > >> >>> > DDR3 prices > >> >>> > > >> >> >> > dropped > > >> >>> > > >> >> >> > -- > >> >>> > > >> >> >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > >> >>> > > >> >> >> -- > >> >>> > > >> >> >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > >> >>> > > >> >> > -- > >> >>> > > >> >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > >> >>> > > >> >> -- > >> >>> > > >> >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > >> >>> > > >> > -- > >> >>> > > >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > >> >>> > > >> -- > >> >>> > > >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > >> >>> > > > -- > >> >>> > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > >> >>> > > -- > >> >>> > > Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > >> >>> > -- > >> >>> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > >> >> -- > >> >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > >> > -- > >> > Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > >> -- > >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > > -- > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > -- > Espionage724 Has A Signature...
-- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
