If I recall correctly there are at least 8 different vendors for pll chips, ics, cypress, winbond, and these are just the ones I remember. I would raise my hands and praise the heavens if I could just find it and increase not that much, I just wanted 133-233 mhz more.
On Jun 6, 2:34 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > Most computers come with the same kind of pll chip and it has some > word on it (maybe ICS?) but if it does, then thats the chip most > likely > > > > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > > If I recall correctly I think thats what someone said (I have no idea > > what a crystal clock is though) > > > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:30 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It's right next to the crystal ...clock?, right? > > >> On Jun 6, 2:23 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> only way I can think of is if you open your computer and look at the mobo > >>> :/ > > >>> I tried googling it, but found nothing. > > >>> Another option is if you could find out the motherboard, you could > >>> maybe try searching that in FCC database maybe? If thats what its > >>> called anyway > > >>> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:21 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > But isn't the gpu connected through pci-e? And do you have any idea > >>> > what's the pll of an hp 530 with a 945gme, or a place where I might > >>> > find it? > > >>> > On Jun 6, 2:17 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> >> ignore that comment lol. That doesn't exactly clock the gpu itself > > >>> >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Espionage724 <[email protected]> > >>> >> wrote: > >>> >> > SetFSB + PCI-E overclocking? > > >>> >> > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:16 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > >>> >> > wrote: > >>> >> >> Well, I've tried a couple dozen versions just now and it just won't > >>> >> >> budge an inch when it comes to 945gm. Fatal errors, exceptions, > >>> >> >> unable > >>> >> >> to read clocks (it said my gma 950 was at 200mhz, I almost freaked). > > >>> >> >> Given the fact that increasing clocks isn't the way to go, I wonder > >>> >> >> if > >>> >> >> there's any resources that might be balanced to feed the gma a bit > >>> >> >> more, since it's all shared resources and all... > > >>> >> >> On Jun 6, 1:55 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> >> >>> PowerStrip...ahh~~ that brings back memories ^^ > >>> >> >>> i remember OCing my SiS6326 (if imnot mistaken) to death by > >>> >> >>> burning it's > >>> >> >>> Core clock..... > >>> >> >>> but that time i dont know that integrated GPU uses bus driver as > >>> >> >>> it's core > >>> >> >>> to the CPU bridge..lol... > > >>> >> >>> but intel 9xx are hard thing to OC...well yeah u can increase it > >>> >> >>> by 50MHz > >>> >> >>> step..but not too much...heat isnt the issue here, some 9xx doesnt > >>> >> >>> even have > >>> >> >>> temperature sensors...the bridge that connects the GPU and CPU > >>> >> >>> also the > >>> >> >>> memory bus/controller might be damaged and u guess what's gonna > >>> >> >>> happened > >>> >> >>> next..well, as long as someone willing to experiment for the sake > >>> >> >>> of > >>> >> >>> discovery, than go ahead ^^ those with celeron CPU, intel 9xx with > >>> >> >>> that CPU > >>> >> >>> on cant even increase the clock to 400+, intel has pun limiter on > >>> >> >>> some > >>> >> >>> celeron class chipset, which in my guess that GMA 9xx somewhat to > >>> >> >>> powerful > >>> >> >>> for the older celeron (mostly single core family) chipset...lol, > >>> >> >>> the > >>> >> >>> irony... > > >>> >> >>> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 7:09 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > >>> >> >>> wrote: > >>> >> >>> > I've read somewhere that you could create a custom 5:4 > >>> >> >>> > resolution that > >>> >> >>> > would act as a middle ground between 800x600 and 1024x768, which > >>> >> >>> > are > >>> >> >>> > both 4:3 whereas the tv is not. If I'm not mistaken I believe > >>> >> >>> > it's > >>> >> >>> > 960x540. > > >>> >> >>> > On Jun 6, 12:05 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> >> >>> > > an S-video cable > > >>> >> >>> > > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 6:47 PM, tribaljet > >>> >> >>> > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> >> >>> > > > sure, with hdmi you can go all the way as both the display > >>> >> >>> > > > adapter and > >>> >> >>> > > > the screen support it, way beyond mere 1080p/i/whatever. > >>> >> >>> > > > so it goes out from s-video and enters the tv with what > >>> >> >>> > > > connector? > > >>> >> >>> > > > On Jun 5, 11:37 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> > >>> >> >>> > > > wrote: > >>> >> >>> > > >> well I heard the max resolution for anyone using a TV via > >>> >> >>> > > >> S-Video was > >>> >> >>> > > >> 1024x768 but the best was 800x600. If you have HDMI, then > >>> >> >>> > > >> its probably > >>> >> >>> > > >> a different story > > >>> >> >>> > > >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 6:28 PM, tribaljet > >>> >> >>> > > >> <[email protected]> > >>> >> >>> > wrote: > >>> >> >>> > > >> > you sure it's impossible? it has great custom resolution > >>> >> >>> > > >> > editing > >>> >> >>> > > >> > options. > > >>> >> >>> > > >> > On Jun 5, 11:19 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> > >>> >> >>> > > >> > wrote: > >>> >> >>> > > >> >> a few year ago maybe 3 or so. I was messing with PS to > >>> >> >>> > > >> >> try to get > >>> >> >>> > > >> >> custom resolutions on my TV from S-video (which I hear is > >>> >> >>> > impossible > >>> >> >>> > > >> >> anyway) > > >>> >> >>> > > >> >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 5:56 PM, tribaljet > >>> >> >>> > > >> >> <[email protected]> > >>> >> >>> > wrote: > >>> >> >>> > > >> >> > How long ago was it? Because maybe later versions > >>> >> >>> > > >> >> > might do the > >>> >> >>> > trick. > > >>> >> >>> > > >> >> > On Jun 5, 10:53 pm, Espionage724 > >>> >> >>> > > >> >> > <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> I'm somewhat sure I tried to use PS and it couldn't > >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> OC the > >>> >> >>> > 950GMA. I > >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> could be wrong though > > >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 5:47 PM, hussam aulaian < > >>> >> >>> > [email protected]> wrote: > >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> > i hav searched many people refused since the > >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> > laptops which has > >>> >> >>> > DDR3 prices > >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> > dropped > > >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> > -- > >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> -- > >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > >>> >> >>> > > >> >> > -- > >>> >> >>> > > >> >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > >>> >> >>> > > >> >> -- > >>> >> >>> > > >> >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > >>> >> >>> > > >> > -- > >>> >> >>> > > >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > >>> >> >>> > > >> -- > >>> >> >>> > > >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > >>> >> >>> > > > -- > >>> >> >>> > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > >>> >> >>> > > -- > >>> >> >>> > > Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > >>> >> >>> > -- > >>> >> >>> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > >>> >> >> -- > >>> >> >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > >>> >> > -- > >>> >> > Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > >>> >> -- > >>> >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > >>> > -- > >>> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > >>> -- > >>> Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > >> -- > >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > -- > > Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > -- > Espionage724 Has A Signature... -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
