lol, I got a whole 300Mhz more :p i even try sometimes for 400Mhz On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:39 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > If I recall correctly there are at least 8 different vendors for pll > chips, ics, cypress, winbond, and these are just the ones I remember. > I would raise my hands and praise the heavens if I could just find it > and increase not that much, I just wanted 133-233 mhz more. > > On Jun 6, 2:34 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: >> Most computers come with the same kind of pll chip and it has some >> word on it (maybe ICS?) but if it does, then thats the chip most >> likely >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: >> > If I recall correctly I think thats what someone said (I have no idea >> > what a crystal clock is though) >> >> > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:30 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> It's right next to the crystal ...clock?, right? >> >> >> On Jun 6, 2:23 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> only way I can think of is if you open your computer and look at the >> >>> mobo :/ >> >> >>> I tried googling it, but found nothing. >> >> >>> Another option is if you could find out the motherboard, you could >> >>> maybe try searching that in FCC database maybe? If thats what its >> >>> called anyway >> >> >>> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:21 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> > But isn't the gpu connected through pci-e? And do you have any idea >> >>> > what's the pll of an hp 530 with a 945gme, or a place where I might >> >>> > find it? >> >> >>> > On Jun 6, 2:17 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> ignore that comment lol. That doesn't exactly clock the gpu itself >> >> >>> >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Espionage724 <[email protected]> >> >>> >> wrote: >> >>> >> > SetFSB + PCI-E overclocking? >> >> >>> >> > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:16 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> >> >>> >> > wrote: >> >>> >> >> Well, I've tried a couple dozen versions just now and it just won't >> >>> >> >> budge an inch when it comes to 945gm. Fatal errors, exceptions, >> >>> >> >> unable >> >>> >> >> to read clocks (it said my gma 950 was at 200mhz, I almost >> >>> >> >> freaked). >> >> >>> >> >> Given the fact that increasing clocks isn't the way to go, I >> >>> >> >> wonder if >> >>> >> >> there's any resources that might be balanced to feed the gma a bit >> >>> >> >> more, since it's all shared resources and all... >> >> >>> >> >> On Jun 6, 1:55 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> PowerStrip...ahh~~ that brings back memories ^^ >> >>> >> >>> i remember OCing my SiS6326 (if imnot mistaken) to death by >> >>> >> >>> burning it's >> >>> >> >>> Core clock..... >> >>> >> >>> but that time i dont know that integrated GPU uses bus driver as >> >>> >> >>> it's core >> >>> >> >>> to the CPU bridge..lol... >> >> >>> >> >>> but intel 9xx are hard thing to OC...well yeah u can increase it >> >>> >> >>> by 50MHz >> >>> >> >>> step..but not too much...heat isnt the issue here, some 9xx >> >>> >> >>> doesnt even have >> >>> >> >>> temperature sensors...the bridge that connects the GPU and CPU >> >>> >> >>> also the >> >>> >> >>> memory bus/controller might be damaged and u guess what's gonna >> >>> >> >>> happened >> >>> >> >>> next..well, as long as someone willing to experiment for the sake >> >>> >> >>> of >> >>> >> >>> discovery, than go ahead ^^ those with celeron CPU, intel 9xx >> >>> >> >>> with that CPU >> >>> >> >>> on cant even increase the clock to 400+, intel has pun limiter on >> >>> >> >>> some >> >>> >> >>> celeron class chipset, which in my guess that GMA 9xx somewhat to >> >>> >> >>> powerful >> >>> >> >>> for the older celeron (mostly single core family) chipset...lol, >> >>> >> >>> the >> >>> >> >>> irony... >> >> >>> >> >>> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 7:09 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> >> >>> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > I've read somewhere that you could create a custom 5:4 >> >>> >> >>> > resolution that >> >>> >> >>> > would act as a middle ground between 800x600 and 1024x768, >> >>> >> >>> > which are >> >>> >> >>> > both 4:3 whereas the tv is not. If I'm not mistaken I believe >> >>> >> >>> > it's >> >>> >> >>> > 960x540. >> >> >>> >> >>> > On Jun 6, 12:05 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > > an S-video cable >> >> >>> >> >>> > > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 6:47 PM, tribaljet >> >>> >> >>> > > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > > > sure, with hdmi you can go all the way as both the display >> >>> >> >>> > > > adapter and >> >>> >> >>> > > > the screen support it, way beyond mere 1080p/i/whatever. >> >>> >> >>> > > > so it goes out from s-video and enters the tv with what >> >>> >> >>> > > > connector? >> >> >>> >> >>> > > > On Jun 5, 11:37 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> >> >>> >> >>> > > > wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > > >> well I heard the max resolution for anyone using a TV via >> >>> >> >>> > > >> S-Video was >> >>> >> >>> > > >> 1024x768 but the best was 800x600. If you have HDMI, then >> >>> >> >>> > > >> its probably >> >>> >> >>> > > >> a different story >> >> >>> >> >>> > > >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 6:28 PM, tribaljet >> >>> >> >>> > > >> <[email protected]> >> >>> >> >>> > wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > > >> > you sure it's impossible? it has great custom resolution >> >>> >> >>> > > >> > editing >> >>> >> >>> > > >> > options. >> >> >>> >> >>> > > >> > On Jun 5, 11:19 pm, Espionage724 >> >>> >> >>> > > >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> a few year ago maybe 3 or so. I was messing with PS to >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> try to get >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> custom resolutions on my TV from S-video (which I hear >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> is >> >>> >> >>> > impossible >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> anyway) >> >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 5:56 PM, tribaljet >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> <[email protected]> >> >>> >> >>> > wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> > How long ago was it? Because maybe later versions >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> > might do the >> >>> >> >>> > trick. >> >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> > On Jun 5, 10:53 pm, Espionage724 >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> I'm somewhat sure I tried to use PS and it couldn't >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> OC the >> >>> >> >>> > 950GMA. I >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> could be wrong though >> >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 5:47 PM, hussam aulaian < >> >>> >> >>> > [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> > i hav searched many people refused since the >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> > laptops which has >> >>> >> >>> > DDR3 prices >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> > dropped >> >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> > -- >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> -- >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... >> >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> > -- >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> -- >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... >> >> >>> >> >>> > > >> > -- >> >>> >> >>> > > >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> >>> >> >>> > > >> -- >> >>> >> >>> > > >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... >> >> >>> >> >>> > > > -- >> >>> >> >>> > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> >>> >> >>> > > -- >> >>> >> >>> > > Espionage724 Has A Signature... >> >> >>> >> >>> > -- >> >>> >> >>> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> >>> >> >> -- >> >>> >> >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> >>> >> > -- >> >>> >> > Espionage724 Has A Signature... >> >> >>> >> -- >> >>> >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... >> >> >>> > -- >> >>> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> >>> -- >> >>> Espionage724 Has A Signature... >> >> >> -- >> >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> > -- >> > Espionage724 Has A Signature... >> >> -- >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >
-- Espionage724 Has A Signature... -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
