pardon me, but i wonder if SetFSB + PCI-E overclocking + PowerStrip clock OC = ??
Powerstrip are limited to Intel 9xx PCI-E bridge clock..if SetFSB can actually increase it, so increasing the core clock in Powerstrip are possible in theory rite? On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 9:48 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > More than a decade ago I had a really bad experience with plls, I used > a program that was supposed to autodetect the pll, its clocks, the > works, but it ended frying my board :( I never understood if it was > the most unfortunate coincidence or if to mess with plls its better we > know exactly the hardware we're dealing with. Anyway, that was on a > time where unlocked cpus didn't cost an arm and a leg :) > > On Jun 6, 2:41 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > > lol, I got a whole 300Mhz more :p i even try sometimes for 400Mhz > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:39 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > If I recall correctly there are at least 8 different vendors for pll > > > chips, ics, cypress, winbond, and these are just the ones I remember. > > > I would raise my hands and praise the heavens if I could just find it > > > and increase not that much, I just wanted 133-233 mhz more. > > > > > On Jun 6, 2:34 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Most computers come with the same kind of pll chip and it has some > > >> word on it (maybe ICS?) but if it does, then thats the chip most > > >> likely > > > > >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Espionage724 <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> > If I recall correctly I think thats what someone said (I have no > idea > > >> > what a crystal clock is though) > > > > >> > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:30 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> >> It's right next to the crystal ...clock?, right? > > > > >> >> On Jun 6, 2:23 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >>> only way I can think of is if you open your computer and look at > the mobo :/ > > > > >> >>> I tried googling it, but found nothing. > > > > >> >>> Another option is if you could find out the motherboard, you could > > >> >>> maybe try searching that in FCC database maybe? If thats what its > > >> >>> called anyway > > > > >> >>> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:21 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> >>> > But isn't the gpu connected through pci-e? And do you have any > idea > > >> >>> > what's the pll of an hp 530 with a 945gme, or a place where I > might > > >> >>> > find it? > > > > >> >>> > On Jun 6, 2:17 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >>> >> ignore that comment lol. That doesn't exactly clock the gpu > itself > > > > >> >>> >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Espionage724 < > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> >>> >> > SetFSB + PCI-E overclocking? > > > > >> >>> >> > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:16 PM, tribaljet < > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> >>> >> >> Well, I've tried a couple dozen versions just now and it > just won't > > >> >>> >> >> budge an inch when it comes to 945gm. Fatal errors, > exceptions, unable > > >> >>> >> >> to read clocks (it said my gma 950 was at 200mhz, I almost > freaked). > > > > >> >>> >> >> Given the fact that increasing clocks isn't the way to go, I > wonder if > > >> >>> >> >> there's any resources that might be balanced to feed the gma > a bit > > >> >>> >> >> more, since it's all shared resources and all... > > > > >> >>> >> >> On Jun 6, 1:55 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >>> >> >>> PowerStrip...ahh~~ that brings back memories ^^ > > >> >>> >> >>> i remember OCing my SiS6326 (if imnot mistaken) to death by > burning it's > > >> >>> >> >>> Core clock..... > > >> >>> >> >>> but that time i dont know that integrated GPU uses bus > driver as it's core > > >> >>> >> >>> to the CPU bridge..lol... > > > > >> >>> >> >>> but intel 9xx are hard thing to OC...well yeah u can > increase it by 50MHz > > >> >>> >> >>> step..but not too much...heat isnt the issue here, some 9xx > doesnt even have > > >> >>> >> >>> temperature sensors...the bridge that connects the GPU and > CPU also the > > >> >>> >> >>> memory bus/controller might be damaged and u guess what's > gonna happened > > >> >>> >> >>> next..well, as long as someone willing to experiment for > the sake of > > >> >>> >> >>> discovery, than go ahead ^^ those with celeron CPU, intel > 9xx with that CPU > > >> >>> >> >>> on cant even increase the clock to 400+, intel has pun > limiter on some > > >> >>> >> >>> celeron class chipset, which in my guess that GMA 9xx > somewhat to powerful > > >> >>> >> >>> for the older celeron (mostly single core family) > chipset...lol, the > > >> >>> >> >>> irony... > > > > >> >>> >> >>> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 7:09 AM, tribaljet < > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> >>> >> >>> > I've read somewhere that you could create a custom 5:4 > resolution that > > >> >>> >> >>> > would act as a middle ground between 800x600 and > 1024x768, which are > > >> >>> >> >>> > both 4:3 whereas the tv is not. If I'm not mistaken I > believe it's > > >> >>> >> >>> > 960x540. > > > > >> >>> >> >>> > On Jun 6, 12:05 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> >>> >> >>> > > an S-video cable > > > > >> >>> >> >>> > > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 6:47 PM, tribaljet < > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> >>> >> >>> > > > sure, with hdmi you can go all the way as both the > display adapter and > > >> >>> >> >>> > > > the screen support it, way beyond mere > 1080p/i/whatever. > > >> >>> >> >>> > > > so it goes out from s-video and enters the tv with > what connector? > > > > >> >>> >> >>> > > > On Jun 5, 11:37 pm, Espionage724 < > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> well I heard the max resolution for anyone using a > TV via S-Video was > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> 1024x768 but the best was 800x600. If you have HDMI, > then its probably > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> a different story > > > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 6:28 PM, tribaljet < > [email protected]> > > >> >>> >> >>> > wrote: > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> > you sure it's impossible? it has great custom > resolution editing > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> > options. > > > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> > On Jun 5, 11:19 pm, Espionage724 < > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> a few year ago maybe 3 or so. I was messing with > PS to try to get > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> custom resolutions on my TV from S-video (which I > hear is > > >> >>> >> >>> > impossible > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> anyway) > > > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 5:56 PM, tribaljet < > [email protected]> > > >> >>> >> >>> > wrote: > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> > How long ago was it? Because maybe later > versions might do the > > >> >>> >> >>> > trick. > > > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> > On Jun 5, 10:53 pm, Espionage724 < > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> I'm somewhat sure I tried to use PS and it > couldn't OC the > > >> >>> >> >>> > 950GMA. I > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> could be wrong though > > > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 5:47 PM, hussam aulaian > < > > >> >>> >> >>> > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> > i hav searched many people refused since the > laptops which has > > >> >>> >> >>> > DDR3 prices > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> > dropped > > > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> > -- > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> -- > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> > -- > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> -- > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> > -- > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> -- > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > > > >> >>> >> >>> > > > -- > > >> >>> >> >>> > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > >> >>> >> >>> > > -- > > >> >>> >> >>> > > Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > > > >> >>> >> >>> > -- > > >> >>> >> >>> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > >> >>> >> >> -- > > >> >>> >> >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > >> >>> >> > -- > > >> >>> >> > Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > > > >> >>> >> -- > > >> >>> >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > > > >> >>> > -- > > >> >>> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > >> >>> -- > > >> >>> Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > > > >> >> -- > > >> >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > >> > -- > > >> > Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > > > >> -- > > >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > > > > -- > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > -- > > Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
