- Powerstrip wouldn't let me adjust either of the bars for the clock - CPUCool and SetFSB are the only things to have my PLL - SpeedFan and CPUFSB didn't have my PLL (which is weird because CPUCool and CPUFSB are made by same company) - CPUCool had a warning that getting PLL data could damage hardware. So don't go testing out unknown PLL's everyone!
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 10:04 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, that's what I was wondering Angelic. But then again it will > increase everything else on that bus. > > On Jun 6, 3:00 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: >> pardon me, but i wonder if SetFSB + PCI-E overclocking + PowerStrip clock OC >> = ?? >> >> Powerstrip are limited to Intel 9xx PCI-E bridge clock..if SetFSB can >> actually increase it, so increasing the core clock in Powerstrip are >> possible in theory rite? >> >> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 9:48 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: >> > More than a decade ago I had a really bad experience with plls, I used >> > a program that was supposed to autodetect the pll, its clocks, the >> > works, but it ended frying my board :( I never understood if it was >> > the most unfortunate coincidence or if to mess with plls its better we >> > know exactly the hardware we're dealing with. Anyway, that was on a >> > time where unlocked cpus didn't cost an arm and a leg :) >> >> > On Jun 6, 2:41 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > lol, I got a whole 300Mhz more :p i even try sometimes for 400Mhz >> >> > > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:39 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > If I recall correctly there are at least 8 different vendors for pll >> > > > chips, ics, cypress, winbond, and these are just the ones I remember. >> > > > I would raise my hands and praise the heavens if I could just find it >> > > > and increase not that much, I just wanted 133-233 mhz more. >> >> > > > On Jun 6, 2:34 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> Most computers come with the same kind of pll chip and it has some >> > > >> word on it (maybe ICS?) but if it does, then thats the chip most >> > > >> likely >> >> > > >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Espionage724 <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > If I recall correctly I think thats what someone said (I have no >> > idea >> > > >> > what a crystal clock is though) >> >> > > >> > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:30 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > >> >> It's right next to the crystal ...clock?, right? >> >> > > >> >> On Jun 6, 2:23 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> >>> only way I can think of is if you open your computer and look at >> > the mobo :/ >> >> > > >> >>> I tried googling it, but found nothing. >> >> > > >> >>> Another option is if you could find out the motherboard, you could >> > > >> >>> maybe try searching that in FCC database maybe? If thats what its >> > > >> >>> called anyway >> >> > > >> >>> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:21 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > >> >>> > But isn't the gpu connected through pci-e? And do you have any >> > idea >> > > >> >>> > what's the pll of an hp 530 with a 945gme, or a place where I >> > might >> > > >> >>> > find it? >> >> > > >> >>> > On Jun 6, 2:17 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> >>> >> ignore that comment lol. That doesn't exactly clock the gpu >> > itself >> >> > > >> >>> >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Espionage724 < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> >>> >> > SetFSB + PCI-E overclocking? >> >> > > >> >>> >> > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:16 PM, tribaljet < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> >>> >> >> Well, I've tried a couple dozen versions just now and it >> > just won't >> > > >> >>> >> >> budge an inch when it comes to 945gm. Fatal errors, >> > exceptions, unable >> > > >> >>> >> >> to read clocks (it said my gma 950 was at 200mhz, I almost >> > freaked). >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> Given the fact that increasing clocks isn't the way to go, I >> > wonder if >> > > >> >>> >> >> there's any resources that might be balanced to feed the gma >> > a bit >> > > >> >>> >> >> more, since it's all shared resources and all... >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> On Jun 6, 1:55 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> >>> >> >>> PowerStrip...ahh~~ that brings back memories ^^ >> > > >> >>> >> >>> i remember OCing my SiS6326 (if imnot mistaken) to death by >> > burning it's >> > > >> >>> >> >>> Core clock..... >> > > >> >>> >> >>> but that time i dont know that integrated GPU uses bus >> > driver as it's core >> > > >> >>> >> >>> to the CPU bridge..lol... >> >> > > >> >>> >> >>> but intel 9xx are hard thing to OC...well yeah u can >> > increase it by 50MHz >> > > >> >>> >> >>> step..but not too much...heat isnt the issue here, some 9xx >> > doesnt even have >> > > >> >>> >> >>> temperature sensors...the bridge that connects the GPU and >> > CPU also the >> > > >> >>> >> >>> memory bus/controller might be damaged and u guess what's >> > gonna happened >> > > >> >>> >> >>> next..well, as long as someone willing to experiment for >> > the sake of >> > > >> >>> >> >>> discovery, than go ahead ^^ those with celeron CPU, intel >> > 9xx with that CPU >> > > >> >>> >> >>> on cant even increase the clock to 400+, intel has pun >> > limiter on some >> > > >> >>> >> >>> celeron class chipset, which in my guess that GMA 9xx >> > somewhat to powerful >> > > >> >>> >> >>> for the older celeron (mostly single core family) >> > chipset...lol, the >> > > >> >>> >> >>> irony... >> >> > > >> >>> >> >>> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 7:09 AM, tribaljet < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > I've read somewhere that you could create a custom 5:4 >> > resolution that >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > would act as a middle ground between 800x600 and >> > 1024x768, which are >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > both 4:3 whereas the tv is not. If I'm not mistaken I >> > believe it's >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > 960x540. >> >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > On Jun 6, 12:05 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > an S-video cable >> >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 6:47 PM, tribaljet < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > > sure, with hdmi you can go all the way as both the >> > display adapter and >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > > the screen support it, way beyond mere >> > 1080p/i/whatever. >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > > so it goes out from s-video and enters the tv with >> > what connector? >> >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > > On Jun 5, 11:37 pm, Espionage724 < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> well I heard the max resolution for anyone using a >> > TV via S-Video was >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> 1024x768 but the best was 800x600. If you have HDMI, >> > then its probably >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> a different story >> >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 6:28 PM, tribaljet < >> > [email protected]> >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > wrote: >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> > you sure it's impossible? it has great custom >> > resolution editing >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> > options. >> >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> > On Jun 5, 11:19 pm, Espionage724 < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> a few year ago maybe 3 or so. I was messing with >> > PS to try to get >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> custom resolutions on my TV from S-video (which I >> > hear is >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > impossible >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> anyway) >> >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 5:56 PM, tribaljet < >> > [email protected]> >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > wrote: >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> > How long ago was it? Because maybe later >> > versions might do the >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > trick. >> >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> > On Jun 5, 10:53 pm, Espionage724 < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> I'm somewhat sure I tried to use PS and it >> > couldn't OC the >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > 950GMA. I >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> could be wrong though >> >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 5:47 PM, hussam aulaian >> > < >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> > i hav searched many people refused since the >> > laptops which has >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > DDR3 prices >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> > dropped >> >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> > -- >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> -- >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... >> >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> > -- >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> -- >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... >> >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> > -- >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> -- >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... >> >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > > -- >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > -- >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > > Espionage724 Has A Signature... >> >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > -- >> > > >> >>> >> >>> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> -- >> > > >> >>> >> >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> > > >> >>> >> > -- >> > > >> >>> >> > Espionage724 Has A Signature... >> >> > > >> >>> >> -- >> > > >> >>> >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... >> >> > > >> >>> > -- >> > > >> >>> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> > > >> >>> -- >> > > >> >>> Espionage724 Has A Signature... >> >> > > >> >> -- >> > > >> >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> > > >> > -- >> > > >> > Espionage724 Has A Signature... >> >> > > >> -- >> > > >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... >> >> > > > -- >> > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> > > -- >> > > Espionage724 Has A Signature... >> >> > -- >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- Espionage724 Has A Signature... -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
