lol..im GMT +8...im in Malaysia so yeah we're neighbor.. well, here's the time, i have uploaded the fix and ready for downloads, up and running ^^ *i cant shake off my old habit of working at late night, it's 2AM here ^^*
rapidshare: http://rapidshare.com/files/403023855/GMA_Mod_V1.1E_fixed.7z.html mediafire: http://www.mediafire.com/?4nmy1jowvme be sure to read the readme first for installation procedure and other stuffs ^^ changelog: - device id bug from V1.1 have been fixed fully, V1.1E should be compatible with all major GMA950 device include in the following chipsets : 945GM, 945G, 945GME, 945GSE and other chipsets id that known. - improve GDI performance : improve aero effects and fluidity. - Improve I/O operations performance (thanks to tribaljet for reporting this) - Laggyness issues have been fixed - OpenGL extension performance increased (varying from application for openGL compitability. - Optimized memory utilization for graphics processing. - stability have been tested for most D3D features including SM2.0 functions such as depth of field. sorry for uploading this pass the deadline and thanks to all that supported my project all the way. On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 10:56 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm Portuguese, same time as London. > So Angelic, I tried to install V1.1E but like I posted before it > lagged, so I went back to V1.1, and since there were a few other bugs > besides that, I wait for a fixed version. I am curious to see how > different it will perform as I'm quite pleased with V1.1. > And what have you thought about controlling setting in V1.2? > > On Jun 26, 3:40 pm, "THEfog ." <[email protected]> wrote: > > Not to far away from me lol (GMT+10) > > > > THEfog > > > > On 27/06/2010 12:34 AM, "Kiki" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > sorry for replying the offtopic question, but to satisfy your > > curiousity, I'm Indonesian, my timezone is GMT+7 (the same as > > Jakarta)... and that's somewhere very far away from South America, I > > think :D > > > > On Jun 26, 6:51 pm, MSI WIND <[email protected]> wrote:> Sorry > for some offtopic question... > > > > -- > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
