Perhaps its more of a perception then anything else. If enabled by
default simply meant we do so because we can (no external libs needed)
rather we think you should have it. There really would be any sort of
an issue, and perhaps finally convince people to install what they
need rather then delegating the thinking to someone else. Just an idea.
On 2-Aug-08, at 10:05 AM, Antony Dovgal wrote:
On 01.08.2008 18:34, Chris Stockton wrote:
Is their a particular reason you are against giving users such a
variety of
tools?
I'm against enabling untested and unmaintained extensions by
default, especially if they are known to cause problems.
--
Wbr, Antony Dovgal
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Ilia Alshanetsky
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
