Please lets keep the [VOTE] scope to its original target, that is
initiating a separate users list.

For other issues, I agree it can be a concern, but thats totally related to
developers/development issues and how to manage the flow of other
information related to JIRA, build, SCM, etc... :).

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Chee Kin Lim <[email protected]>wrote:

> +1
>
> Best regards,
> Chee Kin
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Kevin Meyer - KMZ <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > My original reason for wanting a users mailing list was to separate out
> > discussions about the framework from questions about the domain (so
> > to speak).
> >
> > It didn't feel appropriate (and it still doesn't) sending questions
> related
> > to "should I implement this DDD code in the Customer class or in the
> > factory?"
> >
> > It has nothing to do with the framework, per se.
> >
> > With regards to filtering out the auto messages, I have filters in my
> > email client that do that for me. Admittedly, it only works on the one
> > client, but anyway. I would support a vote for a list that receives the
> > JIRA / Hudson messages, if required.
> >
> > On 11 Dec 2011 at 15:34, Rafael Chaves wrote:
> >
> > > It is not that is confusing, it is a matter of increasing the
> > > signal-to-noise ratio. I want to be aware of the discussions. I have no
> > > interest on any of the generated messages (issues, builds, commits). I
> > > suspect others (non-committers) may feel the same.
> > >
> > > I don't get why we would need to pollute the discussion with any
> > > automatically generated messages, even if a single message a day. Those
> > > (probably committers) interested in following commit, issue tracking or
> > > build activity closely are probably already able to opt-in for
> automatic
> > > notifications on an individual basis, with each one of those activity
> > > streams.
> > >
> > > My 2 cents.
> >
> >
>



-- 
Thanks
- Mohammad Nour
----
"Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving"
- Albert Einstein

Reply via email to