usually commits should go to isis-commits and JIRA will get routed to isis-dev.
I don't think we have that many issues that we are confusing end-users, do you? So I'm rather +0 for it. LieGrue, strub ----- Original Message ----- > From: Rafael Chaves <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 7:52 PM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Creation of an isis-users@iao mailing list > > +1 for a users list... > > ...but my goal is really +1 for automated messages going elsewhere. > > I don't seek to separate committer vs. adopter discussions. I am fine with > that aspect of having a single list - I think that only becomes an issue in > very popular projects, and that is not a problem Isis has yet. > > What I do care about is that we don't have machine generated messages in > the discussion list. Having a second list (for auto-generated messages > only) is the best way of accomplishing that IMO. > > Cheers, > > Rafael > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Dan Haywood > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> True that, whatever the outcome of this vote, we'll need to continue >> working on building the userbase. >> >> Perhaps another way of explaining my concern: I think the vote for a users >> list should really only have users (non-mentors and non-committers) voting >> on it. If there aren't 3 users who can be found who would like a users >> list, then I don't think it is yet merited. >> >> Dan >> >> >> But I think that a vote for a users list >> >> On 11 December 2011 17:23, Mohammad Nour El-Din <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> > Hi... >> > >> > On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Dan Haywood >> > <[email protected]>wrote: >> > >> > > +0 >> > > >> > > Thinking on this a little more, my only concern is that, if we do > spawn >> > off >> > > an isis-users, and then turns out to be very quiet, that this > might be >> > more >> > > off-putting to would-be users than having just the single list. >> > > >> > > But I'm happy to be persuaded either way... >> > > >> > >> > You have a point on your concern, but the indications now point to > that >> we >> > started and still gaining more attention from users and hence putting >> this >> > traffic on its own mailing list, IMHO, should be the way to go. What > can >> > happen after that, like having low user traffic afterwords, which is a >> > possibility, is something still in the future and in either way it is >> still >> > in our hands to gain more and more users. >> > >> > >> > > >> > > Dan >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On 11 December 2011 16:58, Kevin Meyer - KMZ > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Since I was the one to raise the initial request, I'll > raise the >> vote! >> > :) >> > > > >> > > > As has been recently discussed on this list [2], wrt [1], > there is a >> > > desire >> > > > to create an isis-users@iao mailing list. >> > > > >> > > > There is no need to harass users interested only in *using* > Isis, >> with >> > > > development autogenerated messages (JIRA, Hudson, etc), and > a >> > > > suggestion is to use the isis-users as a way of doing this. >> > > > >> > > > Please indicate your support or not for this proposal. >> > > > >> > > > Please vote now. >> > > > >> > > > [ ] +1 >> > > > [ ] 0 >> > > > [ ] -1 >> > > > >> > > > --- >> > > > [1] http://bit.ly/tpl3ny >> > > > [2] http://isis.markmail.org/message/mx2pzz2hsvvivahq >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Thanks >> > - Mohammad Nour >> > ---- >> > "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must > keep >> moving" >> > - Albert Einstein >> > >> >
