Well, we have an isis-commits list. I'm guessing the automated messages that you are referring to are those from JIRA?
Dan On 11 December 2011 18:59, Rafael Chaves <[email protected]> wrote: > IOW, I guess my vote is really a +1 for a isis-commits list, like many > projects have. > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Rafael Chaves <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > +1 for a users list... > > > > ...but my goal is really +1 for automated messages going elsewhere. > > > > I don't seek to separate committer vs. adopter discussions. I am fine > with > > that aspect of having a single list - I think that only becomes an issue > in > > very popular projects, and that is not a problem Isis has yet. > > > > What I do care about is that we don't have machine generated messages in > > the discussion list. Having a second list (for auto-generated messages > > only) is the best way of accomplishing that IMO. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Rafael > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Dan Haywood < > [email protected] > > > wrote: > > > >> True that, whatever the outcome of this vote, we'll need to continue > >> working on building the userbase. > >> > >> Perhaps another way of explaining my concern: I think the vote for a > users > >> list should really only have users (non-mentors and non-committers) > voting > >> on it. If there aren't 3 users who can be found who would like a users > >> list, then I don't think it is yet merited. > >> > >> Dan > >> > >> > >> But I think that a vote for a users list > >> > >> On 11 December 2011 17:23, Mohammad Nour El-Din < > [email protected] > >> >wrote: > >> > >> > Hi... > >> > > >> > On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Dan Haywood > >> > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> > > >> > > +0 > >> > > > >> > > Thinking on this a little more, my only concern is that, if we do > >> spawn > >> > off > >> > > an isis-users, and then turns out to be very quiet, that this might > be > >> > more > >> > > off-putting to would-be users than having just the single list. > >> > > > >> > > But I'm happy to be persuaded either way... > >> > > > >> > > >> > You have a point on your concern, but the indications now point to > that > >> we > >> > started and still gaining more attention from users and hence putting > >> this > >> > traffic on its own mailing list, IMHO, should be the way to go. What > can > >> > happen after that, like having low user traffic afterwords, which is a > >> > possibility, is something still in the future and in either way it is > >> still > >> > in our hands to gain more and more users. > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > Dan > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On 11 December 2011 16:58, Kevin Meyer - KMZ <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Since I was the one to raise the initial request, I'll raise the > >> vote! > >> > :) > >> > > > > >> > > > As has been recently discussed on this list [2], wrt [1], there > is a > >> > > desire > >> > > > to create an isis-users@iao mailing list. > >> > > > > >> > > > There is no need to harass users interested only in *using* Isis, > >> with > >> > > > development autogenerated messages (JIRA, Hudson, etc), and a > >> > > > suggestion is to use the isis-users as a way of doing this. > >> > > > > >> > > > Please indicate your support or not for this proposal. > >> > > > > >> > > > Please vote now. > >> > > > > >> > > > [ ] +1 > >> > > > [ ] 0 > >> > > > [ ] -1 > >> > > > > >> > > > --- > >> > > > [1] http://bit.ly/tpl3ny > >> > > > [2] http://isis.markmail.org/message/mx2pzz2hsvvivahq > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Thanks > >> > - Mohammad Nour > >> > ---- > >> > "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep > >> moving" > >> > - Albert Einstein > >> > > >> > > > > >
