+1 Best regards, Chee Kin
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Kevin Meyer - KMZ <[email protected]> wrote: > My original reason for wanting a users mailing list was to separate out > discussions about the framework from questions about the domain (so > to speak). > > It didn't feel appropriate (and it still doesn't) sending questions related > to "should I implement this DDD code in the Customer class or in the > factory?" > > It has nothing to do with the framework, per se. > > With regards to filtering out the auto messages, I have filters in my > email client that do that for me. Admittedly, it only works on the one > client, but anyway. I would support a vote for a list that receives the > JIRA / Hudson messages, if required. > > On 11 Dec 2011 at 15:34, Rafael Chaves wrote: > > > It is not that is confusing, it is a matter of increasing the > > signal-to-noise ratio. I want to be aware of the discussions. I have no > > interest on any of the generated messages (issues, builds, commits). I > > suspect others (non-committers) may feel the same. > > > > I don't get why we would need to pollute the discussion with any > > automatically generated messages, even if a single message a day. Those > > (probably committers) interested in following commit, issue tracking or > > build activity closely are probably already able to opt-in for automatic > > notifications on an individual basis, with each one of those activity > > streams. > > > > My 2 cents. > >
