On 12 December 2011 05:17, Kevin Meyer - KMZ <[email protected]> wrote: > My original reason for wanting a users mailing list was to separate out > discussions about the framework from questions about the domain (so > to speak). > > It didn't feel appropriate (and it still doesn't) sending questions related > to "should I implement this DDD code in the Customer class or in the > factory?" > > It has nothing to do with the framework, per se.
Agreed totally. + 1 for a user list Bilgin > > With regards to filtering out the auto messages, I have filters in my > email client that do that for me. Admittedly, it only works on the one > client, but anyway. I would support a vote for a list that receives the > JIRA / Hudson messages, if required. > > On 11 Dec 2011 at 15:34, Rafael Chaves wrote: > >> It is not that is confusing, it is a matter of increasing the >> signal-to-noise ratio. I want to be aware of the discussions. I have no >> interest on any of the generated messages (issues, builds, commits). I >> suspect others (non-committers) may feel the same. >> >> I don't get why we would need to pollute the discussion with any >> automatically generated messages, even if a single message a day. Those >> (probably committers) interested in following commit, issue tracking or >> build activity closely are probably already able to opt-in for automatic >> notifications on an individual basis, with each one of those activity >> streams. >> >> My 2 cents. >
