I would be +1 for something along these lines. Ideally Jira & Jenkins messages to go to a different list, then a periodic (daily?) digest summary of Jira messages to main Isis-Dev list.
Mike Burton (iPhone) On 11 Dec 2011, at 21:15, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > usually commits should go to isis-commits and JIRA will get routed to > isis-dev. > > I don't think we have that many issues that we are confusing end-users, do > you? > > So I'm rather +0 for it. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Rafael Chaves <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: >> Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 7:52 PM >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Creation of an isis-users@iao mailing list >> >> +1 for a users list... >> >> ...but my goal is really +1 for automated messages going elsewhere. >> >> I don't seek to separate committer vs. adopter discussions. I am fine with >> that aspect of having a single list - I think that only becomes an issue in >> very popular projects, and that is not a problem Isis has yet. >> >> What I do care about is that we don't have machine generated messages in >> the discussion list. Having a second list (for auto-generated messages >> only) is the best way of accomplishing that IMO. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Rafael >> >> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Dan Haywood >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> True that, whatever the outcome of this vote, we'll need to continue >>> working on building the userbase. >>> >>> Perhaps another way of explaining my concern: I think the vote for a users >>> list should really only have users (non-mentors and non-committers) voting >>> on it. If there aren't 3 users who can be found who would like a users >>> list, then I don't think it is yet merited. >>> >>> Dan >>> >>> >>> But I think that a vote for a users list >>> >>> On 11 December 2011 17:23, Mohammad Nour El-Din <[email protected] >>>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi... >>>> >>>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Dan Haywood >>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> +0 >>>>> >>>>> Thinking on this a little more, my only concern is that, if we do >> spawn >>>> off >>>>> an isis-users, and then turns out to be very quiet, that this >> might be >>>> more >>>>> off-putting to would-be users than having just the single list. >>>>> >>>>> But I'm happy to be persuaded either way... >>>>> >>>> >>>> You have a point on your concern, but the indications now point to >> that >>> we >>>> started and still gaining more attention from users and hence putting >>> this >>>> traffic on its own mailing list, IMHO, should be the way to go. What >> can >>>> happen after that, like having low user traffic afterwords, which is a >>>> possibility, is something still in the future and in either way it is >>> still >>>> in our hands to gain more and more users. >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Dan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 11 December 2011 16:58, Kevin Meyer - KMZ >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Since I was the one to raise the initial request, I'll >> raise the >>> vote! >>>> :) >>>>>> >>>>>> As has been recently discussed on this list [2], wrt [1], >> there is a >>>>> desire >>>>>> to create an isis-users@iao mailing list. >>>>>> >>>>>> There is no need to harass users interested only in *using* >> Isis, >>> with >>>>>> development autogenerated messages (JIRA, Hudson, etc), and >> a >>>>>> suggestion is to use the isis-users as a way of doing this. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please indicate your support or not for this proposal. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please vote now. >>>>>> >>>>>> [ ] +1 >>>>>> [ ] 0 >>>>>> [ ] -1 >>>>>> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> [1] http://bit.ly/tpl3ny >>>>>> [2] http://isis.markmail.org/message/mx2pzz2hsvvivahq >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thanks >>>> - Mohammad Nour >>>> ---- >>>> "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must >> keep >>> moving" >>>> - Albert Einstein >>>> >>> >>
