Looks like you are not aware of JSG. and Pjal manual which of course should be reworked.
Sunish On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 1:38 AM, Richard Gentle-Green < [email protected]> wrote: > OK here I go again sticking my neck out as a newbie!! > > > What we appear to have within this group is a vast amount of technical > knowledge and expertise (certainly far beyond my own) about a language that > doesn't have a standardised instruction set or manual. > > Because of the numerous versions of lbraries for various functions, the > structure of the language imediately loses integrity. > > Vast amounts of work have been and obviously are still being put into > developing libraries to accomodate the vast diversity of requirements. > > The outline language JAL has a common structure which is (for most > programmers) easy to understand and work with. > > The backbone of libraries do not seem to have a common methodolgy to > facilitate universal integration. > > Without a garaunteed library 'plug-in' system with standardised JAL > language calls, we will always be left with a piecemeal solution to PIC > programming problems. > > > Just my view at this time............I stand to be corrected! > > Rich G-G > > -----Original Message----- > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]*on Behalf > Of *Sunish Issac > *Sent:* 17 July 2009 14:09 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [jallib] Re: Main differences between JALlib and Bert van dam's > Lib > > Having a wiki doesn't make much of a difference than a blog, for a > beginner, both are confusing. A site without clutter, with clear cut layout > is what would make a difference. Do you know the amount of traffic I get on > jal.sunish.net which is a crappy broken outdated site, but has the old jal > and pjal manuals. A full fledged site with good design is badly needed for > JALV2. A wiki or blog has its own purpose, but may not serve as a beginner. > > Sunish > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 3:12 PM, phalox <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > 2. jallib language reference sucks, the manual's layout is horrible >> > and needs to be updated. http://www.casadeyork.com/jalv2/language.html >> >> But at least it exits. Could be part of a wiki. >> >> >> ----- >> >> I just had a peak at the source code :-) Horrible :-D >> I think Joep ?? wrote it. And he did it with OpenOffice! >> >> Styling isn't that hard, it's just CSS code. But it is hard when every >> line of the code contains styling-parameters. >> 1 general CSS file is a whole lot better, but that means the entire >> code has to be rewritten. >> >> I actually found some new, interesting and understandable things in >> this document. But then again I also saw things I didn't understand at >> all. >> A volatile variable for example... I've never used it before in Bert's >> book :-) >> >> Toon >> >> > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
