2009/7/17 phalox <[email protected]>: > > > I just had a peak at the source code :-) Horrible :-D > I think Joep ?? wrote it. Thanks for the compliment... but no, I did not write this.
> And he did it with OpenOffice! I am a microsoft office man (not by fait, but by habit - I office a lot for my job). The document is created by Kyle and I suspect he started it mainly for his own reference. I did however fix the references of the current version, since due to an openoffice bug, the content table was not up to date and the links did not work. > Styling isn't that hard, it's just CSS code. But it is hard when every > line of the code contains styling-parameters. > 1 general CSS file is a whole lot better, but that means the entire > code has to be rewritten. True if you write html. But who cares if it is generated from a word processor (as long as it works)? > I actually found some new, interesting and understandable things in > this document. But then again I also saw things I didn't understand at > all. This document is very suitable for defining the language - unambiguous and complete. But it is not so good for learning the language or as a reference (to brief imo). Joep --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
