From: "Serge Knystautas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Could you include some additional information to that bug report? I might > expect that kind of report if someone was unfamiliar to James, but heck, you > wrote the NNTP server originally and probably know more about what's wrong > than anyone. > Even if you don't know implementation-wise what's broken, any > additional information would be appreciated so others could contribute to > the fix (or in my case, just to be able to knowledgeably vote on whether > this is something to address in the 2.1 or post 2.1 release, since that > what's you seem to be pushing for.)
Serge it is really easy to fix this. There is a known good version(2.0) and bad version(2.1). If anyone wants to address this, do a network trace and see the diff. Alternativly Apply the NNTP Fixes (list, authinfo and character conversion in headers are the necessary fixes) on a good version. Move it to new service model. Keep the current NNTP code as is in proposals area. Move javadocs etc and all other improvements post 2.1. This is doable in one day and very safe to do. Spend another day writing automated test. Checkin code. Harmeet -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
