I think the reason is largely historical at this point frankly.

I think one could /now/ do a great Java in browser.  Java blew its 
chance in this regard by not being ready when Sun attempted to do this 
and getting a reputation as ill-suited for this.  Additionally many 
browsers were done by communities that felt divorced from Java (prior to 
OpenJDK).

The issue is that no one wants to do a new browser now.  Everyone's 
glomming onto WebKit, Mozilla, or Opera.

Casper Bang wrote:
> Let's turn it on the head for a moment, whom of you are currently
> reading this from HotJava or another Java based browser? Ok. And why
> not?
>
> /Casper
>
> On Sep 18, 6:02 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>   
>> Ahhh the irony...a Java development environment that only works on one
>> platform.
>>
>> On Sep 18, 11:26 am, "Viktor Klang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Joshua Marinacci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>       
>>>> out of curiosity, why does your app need 70 jars?
>>>>         
>>> 70 jars of Java on the wall, 70 jars of Java.
>>> Take one down and pass it around, 69 jars of Java on the wall.
>>>       
>>>> On Sep 18, 2008, at 8:05 AM, Amarjeet Singh wrote:
>>>>         
>>>> I just tried this IDE and a couple of quick points:
>>>>         
>>>> - No support for multiple source paths.
>>>> - No JUnit support. However, it does support ANT and hence JUnit tests
>>>> could be an ANT task.
>>>> - Quirks like, "one has to add each java jar file, individually from a
>>>> dialog box". I was trying to import about 70 jar files and I finally gave 
>>>> up
>>>> after adding 5 jars.
>>>> - No project types, except for a java application and a java applet. The
>>>> whole web has been left out.
>>>> - No import functionality from existing projects from a different IDE.
>>>>         
>>>> It reminds me of the days when I was using Kawa, a native IDE for java.
>>>>         
>>>> Just my thoughts. If you can extract speed out of it being a C++
>>>> application capable of running and compiling java, with not too many fancy
>>>> requirements around enterprise application development, then go ahead.
>>>>         
>>>> Btw, have you tried Blue-J? Blue-J is primarily a java language teaching
>>>> IDE, but it sure should be capable of doing more.
>>>>         
>>>> Regards
>>>>         
>>>> Amarjeet
>>>>         
>>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 2:08 PM, allen cheung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> I'm a Java beginner and now sourcing a lightweight Java IDE for my
>>>>> school projects. I used Eclipse before but it ran a bit slow on my 2
>>>>> yrs old computer.
>>>>>           
>>>>> Anyone has tried JCODER,http://www.jcoder.com.
>>>>>           
>>>>> I'm using its Lite version and consider to switch to its full version.
>>>>>           
>>>>> Appreciate your comments.
>>>>>           
>>>> --
>>>> Amarjeet Singh
>>>> Phone: +91-98712-76661
>>>>         
>>> --
>>> Viktor Klang
>>> Senior Systems Analyst
>>>       
> >
>
>   


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to