Indecently, thanks for introducing him to the Java police. They are plentiful and always ready to put people in place for holding unapproved opinions or thinking outside the Java box.
/Casper On Sep 18, 8:15 pm, "Amarjeet Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I feel sorry for Allen, who had started this thread as an IDE recommendation > question and sees this discussion going into the areas of native versus > java... > > And he did mention that he was a beginner. Sure is a nice way to introduce > him into the idiosyncrasies of java. Welcome Allen! > > Regards > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Joshua Marinacci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I see no purpose in writing a new HTML renderer in Java. In fact, I see no > > point in doing a new one in C or any other language given that WebKit and > > Gecko (the renderer at the core of FireFox) exist. Making a new renderer is > > an incredible amount of work that would serve little purpose. I *do* see > > value in a webbrowser written in Java, but using one of those two > > renderers.- > > Josh > > > On Sep 18, 2008, at 9:42 AM, Jess Holle wrote: > > > I think the reason is largely historical at this point frankly. > > > I think one could *now* do a great Java in browser. Java blew its chance > > in this regard by not being ready when Sun attempted to do this and getting > > a reputation as ill-suited for this. Additionally many browsers were done > > by communities that felt divorced from Java (prior to OpenJDK). > > > The issue is that no one wants to do a new browser now. Everyone's > > glomming onto WebKit, Mozilla, or Opera. > > > Casper Bang wrote: > > > Let's turn it on the head for a moment, whom of you are currently > > reading this from HotJava or another Java based browser? Ok. And why > > not? > > > /Casper > > > On Sep 18, 6:02 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > Ahhh the irony...a Java development environment that only works on one > > platform. > > > On Sep 18, 11:26 am, "Viktor Klang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Joshua Marinacci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > out of curiosity, why does your app need 70 jars? > > > 70 jars of Java on the wall, 70 jars of Java. > > Take one down and pass it around, 69 jars of Java on the wall. > > > On Sep 18, 2008, at 8:05 AM, Amarjeet Singh wrote: > > > I just tried this IDE and a couple of quick points: > > > - No support for multiple source paths. > > - No JUnit support. However, it does support ANT and hence JUnit tests > > could be an ANT task. > > - Quirks like, "one has to add each java jar file, individually from a > > dialog box". I was trying to import about 70 jar files and I finally gave up > > after adding 5 jars. > > - No project types, except for a java application and a java applet. The > > whole web has been left out. > > - No import functionality from existing projects from a different IDE. > > > It reminds me of the days when I was using Kawa, a native IDE for java. > > > Just my thoughts. If you can extract speed out of it being a C++ > > application capable of running and compiling java, with not too many fancy > > requirements around enterprise application development, then go ahead. > > > Btw, have you tried Blue-J? Blue-J is primarily a java language teaching > > IDE, but it sure should be capable of doing more. > > > Regards > > > Amarjeet > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 2:08 PM, allen cheung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > I'm a Java beginner and now sourcing a lightweight Java IDE for my > > school projects. I used Eclipse before but it ran a bit slow on my 2 > > yrs old computer. > > > Anyone has tried JCODER,http://www.jcoder.com. > > > I'm using its Lite version and consider to switch to its full version. > > > Appreciate your comments. > > > -- > > Amarjeet Singh > > Phone: +91-98712-76661 > > > -- > > Viktor Klang > > Senior Systems Analyst > > -- > Amarjeet Singh > Phone: +91-98712-76661 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
