2011/5/14 Cédric Beust ♔ <[email protected]> > > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Moandji Ezana <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Kevin Wright <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> If you class tablets as PCs then you're already being flexible with your >>> definitions. >> >> >> Why is a tablet not a PC? >> > > Personally, I think it is, but Apple is trying hard to call them > differently, most likely in an attempt to be able to claim that they own > whatever this new market is called (the PC market has obviously already been > claimed by Windows). > > How do you define "PC" such that it includes iPads, but not iPhones? After all, the only significant difference is screen size.
If defining PCs in terms of Screen size, then does this exclude headless servers from the definition? If you *do* allow iPhones in the definition, then why not also include symbian devices? > -- > Cédric > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- Kevin Wright gtalk / msn : [email protected] <[email protected]>mail: [email protected] vibe / skype: kev.lee.wright quora: http://www.quora.com/Kevin-Wright twitter: @thecoda "My point today is that, if we wish to count lines of code, we should not regard them as "lines produced" but as "lines spent": the current conventional wisdom is so foolish as to book that count on the wrong side of the ledger" ~ Dijkstra -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
