Hi Jeffrey and Aaron, We are currently evaluating the effort to perform those changes.. If the effort is not that big, I personally, would like to make that change and contribute to the community.
I'll need some guideline from where to start, and regarding that I'm relying on you guys :D Which should be the best approach to start this change ? Regards, Nuno On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 15:30, Jeffrey Kesselman <jef...@gmail.com> wrote: > The source is available, couldn't you go through it and change the > references yourselves? > > That seems a lot less costly then abandoning the whole library. > > Maybe you could even contribute those changes back to the community... > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Nuno Sénica <nsen...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > At the company where I work for, we have an application which relies on > JCS > > and it has proven to be a good solution so far. But now, we were informed > > about legal issues by using concurrent lib and we are being instructed to > > change the caching lib. > > > > My question is if there's any plan to use the native concurrent instead > of > > the lib that JSC depend on at the moment ? Is so, when it is planned to > be > > available ? > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Regards, > > Nuno > > > > > > -- > ~~ Microsoft help desk says: reply hazy, ask again later. ~~ >
