Hi Jeffrey Thanks.
I'll try to do it from trunk, I just need to setup the environment and try to perform these changes.. I'll request some help when I'm stuck eheheh If you have any extra tip, just let me know :) Thanks for your support. On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 16:02, Jeffrey Kesselman <jef...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well i don't know the codebase so Aaron is your better reference there > BUT... > > Since the large majority of Doug's concurrent library got ported as is into > the JDK, Id start by simply taking his library out of your build path in > eclipse. Then follow the errors and everywhere it can't find a reference > to > a concurrent utility, use's Eclipse's help to add the proper import. > > Id imagine it cant be more then a day or two of very mechanical work... > > Alternately, if your a perl type hacker you could try writing a script that > would look for the string that is doug's package name in the file and > repalce it with the JDK package. > > JK > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Nuno Sénica <nsen...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Jeffrey and Aaron, > > > > We are currently evaluating the effort to perform those changes.. If the > > effort is not that big, I personally, would like to make that change and > > contribute to the community. > > > > I'll need some guideline from where to start, and regarding that I'm > > relying > > on you guys :D > > > > Which should be the best approach to start this change ? > > > > Regards, > > Nuno > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 15:30, Jeffrey Kesselman <jef...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > The source is available, couldn't you go through it and change the > > > references yourselves? > > > > > > That seems a lot less costly then abandoning the whole library. > > > > > > Maybe you could even contribute those changes back to the community... > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Nuno Sénica <nsen...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > At the company where I work for, we have an application which relies > on > > > JCS > > > > and it has proven to be a good solution so far. But now, we were > > informed > > > > about legal issues by using concurrent lib and we are being > instructed > > to > > > > change the caching lib. > > > > > > > > My question is if there's any plan to use the native concurrent > instead > > > of > > > > the lib that JSC depend on at the moment ? Is so, when it is planned > to > > > be > > > > available ? > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Nuno > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > ~~ Microsoft help desk says: reply hazy, ask again later. ~~ > > > > > > > > > -- > ~~ Microsoft help desk says: reply hazy, ask again later. ~~ >
