Hi Aaron :) Here I am again querying you on the status of this task.
Did you have the chance the start it ? :) How it is going. Best regards, Nuno Sénica On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:31, Nuno Sénica <nsen...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Aaron > > Once again thanks for your inputs.. > > Since it is not a matter of find and replace, maybe I'll wait a couple of > weeks so that you take on that task :) > > I'll poke by then just to know how the work is going. > > Regads and thanks a lot once again. > > Nuno > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 16:24, Aaron Smuts <asm...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> It's not a simple matter of find and replace. If it was, I would have >> done it some time back. . . . >> >> This is such an extensive change, it's probably best that I do it. But >> feel free to give it a try. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Aaron >> >> --- On Thu, 8/27/09, Aaron Smuts <asm...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> > From: Aaron Smuts <asm...@yahoo.com> >> > Subject: Re: Remove dependency for concurrent.jar >> > To: "JCS Users List" <jcs-users@jakarta.apache.org> >> > Date: Thursday, August 27, 2009, 8:21 AM >> > In my first email, I pointed out >> > several things that would need to be changed. You can >> > simply search for the util concurrent import and find them >> > all. "EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent" >> > >> > ClockDaemon is used more than the poooled executor. . . . >> > >> > Yes, there is a backport for JDK 1.4. A backport >> > implements something available only in a new version. >> > In this case, the backport is of the 1.5 concurrent >> > library. This allows you to compile and run in >> > 1.4. But if you are running 1.5 or later, you don't >> > need to backport jar. >> > >> > There are some subtle changes between the two. But it >> > should be perfectly possible to get it working in a few >> > days. Take a crack at it if you want. I'll get >> > to it in about two weeks. >> > >> > Aaron >> > >> > >> > >> > --- On Thu, 8/27/09, Jeffrey Kesselman <jef...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > From: Jeffrey Kesselman <jef...@gmail.com> >> > > Subject: Re: Remove dependency for concurrent.jar >> > > To: "JCS Users List" <jcs-users@jakarta.apache.org> >> > > Date: Thursday, August 27, 2009, 8:02 AM >> > > Well i don't know the codebase so >> > > Aaron is your better reference there >> > > BUT... >> > > >> > > Since the large majority of Doug's concurrent library >> > got >> > > ported as is into >> > > the JDK, Id start by simply taking his library out of >> > your >> > > build path in >> > > eclipse. Then follow the errors and everywhere it >> > > can't find a reference to >> > > a concurrent utility, use's Eclipse's help to add the >> > > proper import. >> > > >> > > Id imagine it cant be more then a day or two of very >> > > mechanical work... >> > > >> > > Alternately, if your a perl type hacker you could try >> > > writing a script that >> > > would look for the string that is doug's package name >> > in >> > > the file and >> > > repalce it with the JDK package. >> > > >> > > JK >> > > >> > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Nuno Sénica <nsen...@gmail.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi Jeffrey and Aaron, >> > > > >> > > > We are currently evaluating the effort to >> > perform >> > > those changes.. If the >> > > > effort is not that big, I personally, would like >> > to >> > > make that change and >> > > > contribute to the community. >> > > > >> > > > I'll need some guideline from where to start, >> > and >> > > regarding that I'm >> > > > relying >> > > > on you guys :D >> > > > >> > > > Which should be the best approach to start this >> > change >> > > ? >> > > > >> > > > Regards, >> > > > Nuno >> > > > >> > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 15:30, Jeffrey Kesselman >> > > <jef...@gmail.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > The source is available, couldn't you go >> > through >> > > it and change the >> > > > > references yourselves? >> > > > > >> > > > > That seems a lot less costly then abandoning >> > the >> > > whole library. >> > > > > >> > > > > Maybe you could even contribute those >> > changes >> > > back to the community... >> > > > > >> > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Nuno >> > Sénica >> > > <nsen...@gmail.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > Hi all, >> > > > > > >> > > > > > At the company where I work for, we >> > have an >> > > application which relies on >> > > > > JCS >> > > > > > and it has proven to be a good solution >> > so >> > > far. But now, we were >> > > > informed >> > > > > > about legal issues by using concurrent >> > lib >> > > and we are being instructed >> > > > to >> > > > > > change the caching lib. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > My question is if there's any plan to >> > use >> > > the native concurrent instead >> > > > > of >> > > > > > the lib that JSC depend on at the >> > moment ? >> > > Is so, when it is planned to >> > > > > be >> > > > > > available ? >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks in advance. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Regards, >> > > > > > Nuno >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > ~~ Microsoft help desk says: reply hazy, >> > ask >> > > again later. ~~ >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > ~~ Microsoft help desk says: reply hazy, ask again >> > later. >> > > ~~ >> > > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jcs-users-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: jcs-users-h...@jakarta.apache.org >> > >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jcs-users-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: jcs-users-h...@jakarta.apache.org >> >> >
