Hi Aaron, Sorry to bother you again with this issue..
Are there any news regarding this ? Best regards, Nuno On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 16:23, Nuno Sénica <nsen...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Aaron :) > > Here I am again querying you on the status of this task. > > Did you have the chance the start it ? :) How it is going. > > Best regards, > Nuno Sénica > > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:31, Nuno Sénica <nsen...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Aaron >> >> Once again thanks for your inputs.. >> >> Since it is not a matter of find and replace, maybe I'll wait a couple of >> weeks so that you take on that task :) >> >> I'll poke by then just to know how the work is going. >> >> Regads and thanks a lot once again. >> >> Nuno >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 16:24, Aaron Smuts <asm...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> It's not a simple matter of find and replace. If it was, I would have >>> done it some time back. . . . >>> >>> This is such an extensive change, it's probably best that I do it. But >>> feel free to give it a try. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Aaron >>> >>> --- On Thu, 8/27/09, Aaron Smuts <asm...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>> > From: Aaron Smuts <asm...@yahoo.com> >>> > Subject: Re: Remove dependency for concurrent.jar >>> > To: "JCS Users List" <jcs-users@jakarta.apache.org> >>> > Date: Thursday, August 27, 2009, 8:21 AM >>> > In my first email, I pointed out >>> > several things that would need to be changed. You can >>> > simply search for the util concurrent import and find them >>> > all. "EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent" >>> > >>> > ClockDaemon is used more than the poooled executor. . . . >>> > >>> > Yes, there is a backport for JDK 1.4. A backport >>> > implements something available only in a new version. >>> > In this case, the backport is of the 1.5 concurrent >>> > library. This allows you to compile and run in >>> > 1.4. But if you are running 1.5 or later, you don't >>> > need to backport jar. >>> > >>> > There are some subtle changes between the two. But it >>> > should be perfectly possible to get it working in a few >>> > days. Take a crack at it if you want. I'll get >>> > to it in about two weeks. >>> > >>> > Aaron >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > --- On Thu, 8/27/09, Jeffrey Kesselman <jef...@gmail.com> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > > From: Jeffrey Kesselman <jef...@gmail.com> >>> > > Subject: Re: Remove dependency for concurrent.jar >>> > > To: "JCS Users List" <jcs-users@jakarta.apache.org> >>> > > Date: Thursday, August 27, 2009, 8:02 AM >>> > > Well i don't know the codebase so >>> > > Aaron is your better reference there >>> > > BUT... >>> > > >>> > > Since the large majority of Doug's concurrent library >>> > got >>> > > ported as is into >>> > > the JDK, Id start by simply taking his library out of >>> > your >>> > > build path in >>> > > eclipse. Then follow the errors and everywhere it >>> > > can't find a reference to >>> > > a concurrent utility, use's Eclipse's help to add the >>> > > proper import. >>> > > >>> > > Id imagine it cant be more then a day or two of very >>> > > mechanical work... >>> > > >>> > > Alternately, if your a perl type hacker you could try >>> > > writing a script that >>> > > would look for the string that is doug's package name >>> > in >>> > > the file and >>> > > repalce it with the JDK package. >>> > > >>> > > JK >>> > > >>> > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Nuno Sénica <nsen...@gmail.com> >>> > > wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > Hi Jeffrey and Aaron, >>> > > > >>> > > > We are currently evaluating the effort to >>> > perform >>> > > those changes.. If the >>> > > > effort is not that big, I personally, would like >>> > to >>> > > make that change and >>> > > > contribute to the community. >>> > > > >>> > > > I'll need some guideline from where to start, >>> > and >>> > > regarding that I'm >>> > > > relying >>> > > > on you guys :D >>> > > > >>> > > > Which should be the best approach to start this >>> > change >>> > > ? >>> > > > >>> > > > Regards, >>> > > > Nuno >>> > > > >>> > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 15:30, Jeffrey Kesselman >>> > > <jef...@gmail.com> >>> > > wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > > > The source is available, couldn't you go >>> > through >>> > > it and change the >>> > > > > references yourselves? >>> > > > > >>> > > > > That seems a lot less costly then abandoning >>> > the >>> > > whole library. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Maybe you could even contribute those >>> > changes >>> > > back to the community... >>> > > > > >>> > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Nuno >>> > Sénica >>> > > <nsen...@gmail.com> >>> > > wrote: >>> > > > > >>> > > > > > Hi all, >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > At the company where I work for, we >>> > have an >>> > > application which relies on >>> > > > > JCS >>> > > > > > and it has proven to be a good solution >>> > so >>> > > far. But now, we were >>> > > > informed >>> > > > > > about legal issues by using concurrent >>> > lib >>> > > and we are being instructed >>> > > > to >>> > > > > > change the caching lib. >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > My question is if there's any plan to >>> > use >>> > > the native concurrent instead >>> > > > > of >>> > > > > > the lib that JSC depend on at the >>> > moment ? >>> > > Is so, when it is planned to >>> > > > > be >>> > > > > > available ? >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > Thanks in advance. >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > Regards, >>> > > > > > Nuno >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > -- >>> > > > > ~~ Microsoft help desk says: reply hazy, >>> > ask >>> > > again later. ~~ >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > ~~ Microsoft help desk says: reply hazy, ask again >>> > later. >>> > > ~~ >>> > > >>> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jcs-users-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: jcs-users-h...@jakarta.apache.org >>> > >>> > >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jcs-users-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: jcs-users-h...@jakarta.apache.org >>> >>> >> >
