Sorry for the delay. I'm working on it, but lots of other things keep coming up. It will take a couple more weeks.
Aaron --- On Thu, 10/1/09, Nuno Sénica <nsen...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Nuno Sénica <nsen...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: Remove dependency for concurrent.jar > To: "JCS Users List" <jcs-users@jakarta.apache.org> > Date: Thursday, October 1, 2009, 12:13 PM > Hi Aaron, > > Sorry to bother you again with this issue.. > > Are there any news regarding this ? > > Best regards, > Nuno > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 16:23, Nuno Sénica <nsen...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Aaron :) > > > > Here I am again querying you on the status of this > task. > > > > Did you have the chance the start it ? :) How it is > going. > > > > Best regards, > > Nuno Sénica > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:31, Nuno Sénica <nsen...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Hi Aaron > >> > >> Once again thanks for your inputs.. > >> > >> Since it is not a matter of find and replace, > maybe I'll wait a couple of > >> weeks so that you take on that task :) > >> > >> I'll poke by then just to know how the work is > going. > >> > >> Regads and thanks a lot once again. > >> > >> Nuno > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 16:24, Aaron Smuts <asm...@yahoo.com> > wrote: > >> > >>> It's not a simple matter of find and > replace. If it was, I would have > >>> done it some time back. . . . > >>> > >>> This is such an extensive change, it's > probably best that I do it. But > >>> feel free to give it a try. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> Aaron > >>> > >>> --- On Thu, 8/27/09, Aaron Smuts <asm...@yahoo.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> > From: Aaron Smuts <asm...@yahoo.com> > >>> > Subject: Re: Remove dependency for > concurrent.jar > >>> > To: "JCS Users List" <jcs-users@jakarta.apache.org> > >>> > Date: Thursday, August 27, 2009, 8:21 AM > >>> > In my first email, I pointed out > >>> > several things that would need to be > changed. You can > >>> > simply search for the util concurrent > import and find them > >>> > all. > "EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent" > >>> > > >>> > ClockDaemon is used more than the poooled > executor. . . . > >>> > > >>> > Yes, there is a backport for JDK > 1.4. A backport > >>> > implements something available only in a > new version. > >>> > In this case, the backport is of the 1.5 > concurrent > >>> > library. This allows you to compile > and run in > >>> > 1.4. But if you are running 1.5 or > later, you don't > >>> > need to backport jar. > >>> > > >>> > There are some subtle changes between the > two. But it > >>> > should be perfectly possible to get it > working in a few > >>> > days. Take a crack at it if you > want. I'll get > >>> > to it in about two weeks. > >>> > > >>> > Aaron > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > --- On Thu, 8/27/09, Jeffrey Kesselman > <jef...@gmail.com> > >>> > wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > From: Jeffrey Kesselman <jef...@gmail.com> > >>> > > Subject: Re: Remove dependency for > concurrent.jar > >>> > > To: "JCS Users List" <jcs-users@jakarta.apache.org> > >>> > > Date: Thursday, August 27, 2009, > 8:02 AM > >>> > > Well i don't know the codebase so > >>> > > Aaron is your better reference > there > >>> > > BUT... > >>> > > > >>> > > Since the large majority of Doug's > concurrent library > >>> > got > >>> > > ported as is into > >>> > > the JDK, Id start by simply taking > his library out of > >>> > your > >>> > > build path in > >>> > > eclipse. Then follow the > errors and everywhere it > >>> > > can't find a reference to > >>> > > a concurrent utility, use's > Eclipse's help to add the > >>> > > proper import. > >>> > > > >>> > > Id imagine it cant be more then a > day or two of very > >>> > > mechanical work... > >>> > > > >>> > > Alternately, if your a perl type > hacker you could try > >>> > > writing a script that > >>> > > would look for the string that is > doug's package name > >>> > in > >>> > > the file and > >>> > > repalce it with the JDK package. > >>> > > > >>> > > JK > >>> > > > >>> > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:36 AM, > Nuno Sénica <nsen...@gmail.com> > >>> > > wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > > > Hi Jeffrey and Aaron, > >>> > > > > >>> > > > We are currently evaluating the > effort to > >>> > perform > >>> > > those changes.. If the > >>> > > > effort is not that big, I > personally, would like > >>> > to > >>> > > make that change and > >>> > > > contribute to the community. > >>> > > > > >>> > > > I'll need some guideline from > where to start, > >>> > and > >>> > > regarding that I'm > >>> > > > relying > >>> > > > on you guys :D > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Which should be the best > approach to start this > >>> > change > >>> > > ? > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Regards, > >>> > > > Nuno > >>> > > > > >>> > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 15:30, > Jeffrey Kesselman > >>> > > <jef...@gmail.com> > >>> > > wrote: > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > The source is available, > couldn't you go > >>> > through > >>> > > it and change the > >>> > > > > references yourselves? > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > That seems a lot less > costly then abandoning > >>> > the > >>> > > whole library. > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > Maybe you could even > contribute those > >>> > changes > >>> > > back to the community... > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at > 7:02 AM, Nuno > >>> > Sénica > >>> > > <nsen...@gmail.com> > >>> > > wrote: > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > Hi all, > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > At the company where > I work for, we > >>> > have an > >>> > > application which relies on > >>> > > > > JCS > >>> > > > > > and it has proven to > be a good solution > >>> > so > >>> > > far. But now, we were > >>> > > > informed > >>> > > > > > about legal issues by > using concurrent > >>> > lib > >>> > > and we are being instructed > >>> > > > to > >>> > > > > > change the caching > lib. > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > My question is if > there's any plan to > >>> > use > >>> > > the native concurrent instead > >>> > > > > of > >>> > > > > > the lib that JSC > depend on at the > >>> > moment ? > >>> > > Is so, when it is planned to > >>> > > > > be > >>> > > > > > available ? > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > Thanks in advance. > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > Regards, > >>> > > > > > Nuno > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > -- > >>> > > > > ~~ Microsoft help desk > says: reply hazy, > >>> > ask > >>> > > again later. ~~ > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > -- > >>> > > ~~ Microsoft help desk says: reply > hazy, ask again > >>> > later. > >>> > > ~~ > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jcs-users-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org > >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: jcs-users-h...@jakarta.apache.org > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jcs-users-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: jcs-users-h...@jakarta.apache.org > >>> > >>> > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: jcs-users-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: jcs-users-h...@jakarta.apache.org
