Hi Aaron Once again thanks for your inputs..
Since it is not a matter of find and replace, maybe I'll wait a couple of weeks so that you take on that task :) I'll poke by then just to know how the work is going. Regads and thanks a lot once again. Nuno On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 16:24, Aaron Smuts <asm...@yahoo.com> wrote: > It's not a simple matter of find and replace. If it was, I would have done > it some time back. . . . > > This is such an extensive change, it's probably best that I do it. But > feel free to give it a try. > > Thanks, > > Aaron > > --- On Thu, 8/27/09, Aaron Smuts <asm...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > From: Aaron Smuts <asm...@yahoo.com> > > Subject: Re: Remove dependency for concurrent.jar > > To: "JCS Users List" <jcs-users@jakarta.apache.org> > > Date: Thursday, August 27, 2009, 8:21 AM > > In my first email, I pointed out > > several things that would need to be changed. You can > > simply search for the util concurrent import and find them > > all. "EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent" > > > > ClockDaemon is used more than the poooled executor. . . . > > > > Yes, there is a backport for JDK 1.4. A backport > > implements something available only in a new version. > > In this case, the backport is of the 1.5 concurrent > > library. This allows you to compile and run in > > 1.4. But if you are running 1.5 or later, you don't > > need to backport jar. > > > > There are some subtle changes between the two. But it > > should be perfectly possible to get it working in a few > > days. Take a crack at it if you want. I'll get > > to it in about two weeks. > > > > Aaron > > > > > > > > --- On Thu, 8/27/09, Jeffrey Kesselman <jef...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > From: Jeffrey Kesselman <jef...@gmail.com> > > > Subject: Re: Remove dependency for concurrent.jar > > > To: "JCS Users List" <jcs-users@jakarta.apache.org> > > > Date: Thursday, August 27, 2009, 8:02 AM > > > Well i don't know the codebase so > > > Aaron is your better reference there > > > BUT... > > > > > > Since the large majority of Doug's concurrent library > > got > > > ported as is into > > > the JDK, Id start by simply taking his library out of > > your > > > build path in > > > eclipse. Then follow the errors and everywhere it > > > can't find a reference to > > > a concurrent utility, use's Eclipse's help to add the > > > proper import. > > > > > > Id imagine it cant be more then a day or two of very > > > mechanical work... > > > > > > Alternately, if your a perl type hacker you could try > > > writing a script that > > > would look for the string that is doug's package name > > in > > > the file and > > > repalce it with the JDK package. > > > > > > JK > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Nuno Sénica <nsen...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Jeffrey and Aaron, > > > > > > > > We are currently evaluating the effort to > > perform > > > those changes.. If the > > > > effort is not that big, I personally, would like > > to > > > make that change and > > > > contribute to the community. > > > > > > > > I'll need some guideline from where to start, > > and > > > regarding that I'm > > > > relying > > > > on you guys :D > > > > > > > > Which should be the best approach to start this > > change > > > ? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Nuno > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 15:30, Jeffrey Kesselman > > > <jef...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > The source is available, couldn't you go > > through > > > it and change the > > > > > references yourselves? > > > > > > > > > > That seems a lot less costly then abandoning > > the > > > whole library. > > > > > > > > > > Maybe you could even contribute those > > changes > > > back to the community... > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Nuno > > Sénica > > > <nsen...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > At the company where I work for, we > > have an > > > application which relies on > > > > > JCS > > > > > > and it has proven to be a good solution > > so > > > far. But now, we were > > > > informed > > > > > > about legal issues by using concurrent > > lib > > > and we are being instructed > > > > to > > > > > > change the caching lib. > > > > > > > > > > > > My question is if there's any plan to > > use > > > the native concurrent instead > > > > > of > > > > > > the lib that JSC depend on at the > > moment ? > > > Is so, when it is planned to > > > > > be > > > > > > available ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Nuno > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > ~~ Microsoft help desk says: reply hazy, > > ask > > > again later. ~~ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > ~~ Microsoft help desk says: reply hazy, ask again > > later. > > > ~~ > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jcs-users-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: jcs-users-h...@jakarta.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jcs-users-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: jcs-users-h...@jakarta.apache.org > >
