> I agree with you that HTML > provides a richer experience.
To me when I hear the word "richer experience", I gag. It's just a marketing buzzword for pictures and sound. It isn't any "richer" ... doesn't provide an extra richness of ideas and it's often used to cover up a poverty of thinking. I don't want to be 'targeted' or 'marketed'. All that java-in-the-fridge spying on your food consumption and sending it to the supermarket stuff makes me *shudder*. Send me an *idea* I can use. And plain text is good enough. Best web page I ever read was a .txt file. In my spare time away from programming I produce music. People in this sphere often think that the latest hot machine buzzword synthesier sampler tweaker knobulator from hell if purchased will make their music sound better. But not necessarily. Stuff that's marketed in that area often uses the words "unlimited possibilities" but what you often end up with is decision deadlock. Most musicians know the best results appear when struggling against limitations. Here's the killer argument; PLAIN TEXT IS BEST FOR REPRESENTING JAVA SOURCE CODE!!! How can you argue against that, especially as I shouted it so loud. ;) regs scot. ____________________________________________________ To change your JDJList options, please visit: http://www.sys-con.com/java/list.cfm Be respectful! Clean up your posts before replying ____________________________________________________
