Sent from my iPhone
On 11 Jun 2011, at 21:10, "Paul Cundell" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> 1. How much was BJ worth in your opinion? > >> I have no idea > > You have no opinion? But you have an opinion on everything Ian. :-) Is that a bad thing Paul? > >>> We clearly can't compete with Norwich, so that's a dead and pointless > argument. > > You've been arguing we can for the last 3 days! No, I've been saying we won't invest properly in the first team squad, in terms of wages and transfer fees. Which is why players are leaving. > >>> I am saying that we should offer the Market rate to players if we want > to keep them. > > I think the crucial point here is 'if we want to keep them' - Bates and > Grayson obviously didn't want to keep BJ as much as you did. > So the club goes to the expense of offering players they don't want contracts? > http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/l/leeds_united/9497466.stm > >>> According to reports, and we know you like reports, Kilkenny failed >>> to respond to the contract offer. > >> Reports from who? Bates? You mean affidavit swearing proven forgetter of > facts on oath Bates? > > Funnily enough........NO. > http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/l/leeds_united/9498761.stm > CBA reading but the media report what the club puts out. Do you think the BBC have ER bugged or summat? >>> I'm just curious as to (a) how you know what I do, specifically > > I have a good memory, when you argued with Chris you said were a lawyer, I wasn't arguing with Chris! He asked me in what context I had experience of the Human Rights Act iirc, so I told him. It's not a secret - I just said I was a solicitor. > last week you said you were in litigation - simple logic makes you a > litigation lawyer - logic suggests that medical negligence must be a large > part of the daily grind of a litigation lawyer, in fact I can't think of any > other form of litigation off the top of my head. Really Paul? Not Commercial Litigation? Commercial Property Litigation? Landlord tenant? Personal Insolvency? Planning? Construction?Contentious Probate? Employment? Media? Professional negligence? Libel? Immigration? If you can think of something, people litigate about it. That's why I used the word 'specifically' when I asked you how you knew. I think we've been googling, haven't we? Little bit creepy if you ask me. Are you a bit like Robin Williams in 'one hour photo'?! Hey if you want a photo just ask? Or have you already done a google images? > >>> and (b) why you keep going on about it. > > Intriguing concept you have, I 'keep going on about it' - I've mentioned > your exact profession once. You've mentioned your job and volunteered > information on a few occasions that I can recall. I would suggest it's you > that keep going on about it, just like it's you that keeps going on about BJ > and NK leaving. They've gone, they don't want to play for Leeds anymore I've mentioned it when asked directly and also volunteered it when Betty mentioned about not wanting any of us as his lawyer. I didn't expect the list weirdo to start frantically googling in an attempt to get pointscoring ammunition in a debate about the transfer policy of LUFC. I admit, naive. > get over > Cheers > Paul (or should that be P?) It should be P....s > > PS Before you begin accusing me of being a Bates apologist I think you ought > to be aware that I got kicked off the list for my hatred of Bates. > You got banned?! I am Jack's complete lack of surprise. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leedslist mailing list > Info and options: > http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > To unsubscribe, email [email protected] > > MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it) > _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
