> >>> 1. How much was BJ worth in your opinion?
> >
> >> I have no idea
> >
> > You have no opinion? But you have an opinion on everything Ian. :-)
> 
> Is that a bad thing Paul?

No Ian, having an opinion is a good thing but if you have an opinion on
everything why can you not grace us with your valued opinion on this
particular question?

> No, I've been saying we won't invest properly in the first team squad, in
terms
> of wages and transfer fees. Which is why players are leaving.

Players? So far we have ascertained that BJ has gone to a premiership club
which by your own admission we couldn't compete with and that Kilkenny
'failed to respond'. Who else has left?
I don't doubt that Bates won't invest in the playing staff as much as
Leicester will, however using BJ and NK as examples of how he's not is a
fundamentally flawed argument. 

> So the club goes to the expense of offering players they don't want
contracts?

No, they offer them a contract to the value they think the player is worth.
If the player wants more than that then yes they don't want them.
Either you're thick or being deliberately obtuse - I suspect it's the latter
which is disappointing.
 
> CBA reading but the media report what the club puts out. Do you think the
BBC
> have ER bugged or summat?

The media report includes a quotation from Simon Grayson, is he a liar too?
Do you think the BBC are in the habit of lying on Cuddly Kens behalf?
In fact, do you feel everything that you don't agree with is a lie?
Have you sought professional help for this mental condition? Dr Mike can you
help Ian please.
You see that's how you ought to do this debate thing Ian, you read the
reports and use the evidence available not just make up your mind and then
stick your fingers in your ears singing 'La la la I'm not listening' - It's
not big and it's not very clever.

> I wasn't arguing with Chris! He asked me in what context I had experience
of
> the Human Rights Act iirc, so I told him. It's not a secret - I just said
I was a
> solicitor.

It was during an argument as I recall - but you can call it a debate if
you'd prefer.

> Really Paul? Not Commercial Litigation? Commercial Property Litigation?
> Landlord tenant? Personal Insolvency? Planning? Construction?Contentious
> Probate? Employment? Media? Professional negligence? Libel? Immigration?
If
> you can think of something, people litigate about it.

Fcuk me - I never knew there was so much to it - that's why you're the
lawyer Ian and I'm not.

> That's why I used the word 'specifically' when I asked you how you knew. I
think we've been googling, haven't we?

No, I hadn't. I have now but get some shite about some scouse law firm and a
lawyer from Virginia.
http://www.google.co.uk/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=1G1SMSN_ENUK421&=&q=ian+j
ames+murray+lawyer&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=
 
Absolutely nothing about a knuckle dragging litigation lawyer from wakey -
or was it ponty? - Joke!

Cheers
Paul

_______________________________________________
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email [email protected]

MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)

Reply via email to