I guess he could have been. I don't know. My theory is that he bottled it. You 
and others disagree - that's fine.

It's getting boring now! Let's move on.


Sent from my iPhone

On 09/07/2013, at 16:40, "Matt Anderson" <[email protected]> wrote:

> How do you know that on each occasion he wasn't ill, injured or worried he 
> was going to be exposed in the press for deviant behaviour.
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On 9 Jul 2013, at 09:16, Ian Murray <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> OK I take that point but he did bottle majors and had a psychological block 
>> surrounding them.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On 09/07/2013, at 16:01, [email protected] wrote:
>> 
>>> Anyone that's been number 1 in the world who happens to have missed out on 
>>> a few majors isn't a bottler. 
>>> 
>>> I bet you would love to be in world top 10 at something even if you didn't 
>>> win anything
>>> 
>>> Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Ian Murray <[email protected]>
>>> Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 14:24:06 
>>> To: Matt Anderson<[email protected]>
>>> Cc: Alan Edgar<[email protected]>; 
>>> [email protected]<[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [LU] Leedslist Digest, Vol 37, Issue 12
>>> 
>>> So why post?!
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>> On 09/07/2013, at 1:49, "Matt Anderson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I don't think me or his bank manager care.
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>> 
>>>> On 8 Jul 2013, at 17:17, Ian Murray <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> How many majors did he win? And why didn't he win any?! 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 09/07/2013, at 0:16, "Matt Anderson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> FFS, he was number one in the world for years. I'd love to be that weak 
>>>>>> minded
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 8 Jul 2013, at 17:14, Ian Murray <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> No but he bottled the majors. No other reason he didn't win one. He had 
>>>>>>> the talent but nerves meant that he couldn't convert. Isn't that the 
>>>>>>> very definition of bottler?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 09/07/2013, at 0:11, "Alan Edgar" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> So you're gonna ignore his Ryder cup record ?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 8 Jul 2013, at 16:54, Ian Murray <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 08/07/2013, at 23:52, "Alan Edgar" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Goran was a better grass court player than Henman - by beating him 
>>>>>>>>>> he reached his 3rd final.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Just as the roof closing changed the final last year, the weather in 
>>>>>>>>>> 2001 saved Goran - half an hour more and Henman would have won. 
>>>>>>>>>> Coming back the following day was a whole new ball game.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On a similar tack - Monty never won a golf major ... Is he a bottler 
>>>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>> In a word: yes
>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On 8 Jul 2013, at 16:29, Ian Murray <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah they gathered to watch Henman, so fair enough 'Herman Hill'. 
>>>>>>>>>>> But they gathered to watch Murray all fortnight, so Murray mound. 
>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah - if they are there to watch Robson it's Robson ridge. It's a 
>>>>>>>>>>> nickname. You make some good points but this is total bobbins.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> He did bottle it. The year ivanesivic won he should have - but he 
>>>>>>>>>>> bottled it. He could win tour titles but he never had the mental 
>>>>>>>>>>> strength to win a slam - he was a choker and a bottler and that's 
>>>>>>>>>>> just a plain fact mate.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On 08/07/2013, at 23:17, "Alan Edgar" <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Henman was the first player people gathered there to see - just 
>>>>>>>>>>>> because he was a lesser player than Murray doesn't mean the name 
>>>>>>>>>>>> changes.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> If Laura robson wins more titles than Murray is it suddenly robson 
>>>>>>>>>>>> ridge ?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Henman didn't bottle it - he played according to his level, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> maximising his talent. It wasn't quite enough, doesn't make him a 
>>>>>>>>>>>> loser.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Any pro sportsman who gets to be top 5 has bags more bottle than 
>>>>>>>>>>>> you, me or anyone else on this list - they couldn't get there 
>>>>>>>>>>>> without it.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Both Henman & Murray have managed a decade or so each of totally 
>>>>>>>>>>>> unreasonable pressure re Wimbledon magnificently.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Without them you'd have had 20 more years of media weeping and 
>>>>>>>>>>>> wailing about GB tennis for a fortnight before reverting to total 
>>>>>>>>>>>> indifference for the other 50 weeks of the year.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8 Jul 2013, at 15:54, Ian Murray <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 08/07/2013, at 22:42, "Alan Edgar" <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On the contrary - disrespectful to Henman to change it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nonsense. Was the hill there before Henman and has it been 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> officially called 'Herman hill'? 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If Grayson had won more than Revie would you accept Revie Rd 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> becoming Grayson Grove ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not if it had been officially called that - but that's completely 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> different to a media nickname.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Didn't think so.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Henman was the best since Perry - 60+ years. Murray wasn't 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around then.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> He's been playing in wombledon for nearly 10 years hasn't he? I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Murray is the best since Perry - 70+ years ... Didn't think the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maths would be so challenging.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If your definition of a loser is someone who doesn't win a slam 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then more than 99% of all pro tennis players are losers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd say someone who was talented enough to win a slam but doesn't 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a loser, yes. He undoubtedly could have won wombledon but he 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> bottled it every time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's a(nother) ridiculous assertion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think it is.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8 Jul 2013, at 14:54, Ian Murray <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 08/07/2013, at 21:29, "Alan Edgar" <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bollocks! He is a miserable uncouth yob who lost to a true 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sportsman.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What on earth is your rationale for that ? !! 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Murray is a charming and witty interviewee, equally gracious 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in defeat as in victory.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The stupendous Djoko- Del potro SF should have been the Final.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The final was exactly what the seeding dictated it should have 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been - 1 v 2 in the world.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DP did play great and made it a quality semi.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Must grudgingly admit that The Git did play well today, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> though.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Big of you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wouldnt see this as a british victory if I was scottish, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> why would I? but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then again I wouldnt see it as a scottish victory when the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> english man won
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tour de france.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you'd written:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "I wouldnt see this as a british victory if I was scottish, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> why would I? but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then again I wouldnt see it as a british victory when the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> english man won
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tour de france.'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then it would have made sense - even though I would 100% 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disagree with you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're not comparing like with like.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's a Brit win when Wiggins wins the Tour, a Brit win when 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Murray wins Wimbledon and a Brit win when they both (while 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wearing Brit kit) win gold in London 2012.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's hope all the Scots see this as a British victory - bet 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they will not.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only the bitter ones will not - the others will see it a win 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for both Scotland & Britain.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Exactly. I think the real miserable bastards are the ones who 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want him to lose.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Couldn't agree more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I couldn't believe it when Sue effing Barker referred to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'henman hill' when she interviewed him after.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why ? It's been know as that ever sinbce the last century - 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the name doesn't change just cos Murray won the tournament.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it was known as Henman Hill when everyone there was 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there to support Henman. He is retired. It is disrespectful to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Murray. Murray Mound.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now he WAS a loser.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lost 4 Wimbledon semis - 3 to the world number 1s (Hewitt, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sampras) and one to an inspired Goran who was saved by the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weather.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 other Slam semis - ranked 4 in the world.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gave us a decade of hope and excitement after previously 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> having to pray that Bates would maybe get to round 3 one year.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He never won a slam. Yeah he won some tour titles but he was a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> loser.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Brit player for 60+ years - wish I was that sort of loser 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Murray is.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Al 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Leedslist mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Info and options: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MARCHING ON TOGETHER
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Leedslist mailing list
>>>>>>> Info and options: 
>>>>>>> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> MARCHING ON TOGETHER
_______________________________________________
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email [email protected]

MARCHING ON TOGETHER

Reply via email to