Jerry,

I will not suggest how they can be made to fit a convention devised for
American locations. Our locations do not fit the four field convention and
when so made to do then the data contained in therein is incorrect. Except
in America there is no such thing as a "standard" four divisions.

You statement: "
However, I think the genealogy software and recommendations have
to go with the LEAST COMMON DENOMINATOR, the same thing we learned in
math class."

in my view, is in no way applicable (and btw. as somebody who read some
maths at university I rather suspect it is not entirely applicable in maths
either). What you are suggesting is more like saying Europe should abandon
the metric system because America uses feet and inches,  No way!!

Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/


-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 8:58 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Entering Locations/Places

Hi Ron, Mike, etal.   I understand your position being against the
standard four divisions in the place names, since they don't fit the
UK.   However, I think the genealogy software and recommendations have
to go with the LEAST COMMON DENOMINATOR, the same thing we learned in
math class.   Most indexes in the genealogy databases will not sort
properly without standardization.

If a person wants to use the "standard" four divisions with their
locations, how would you suggest they enter an ENGLISH location within
those four divisions?   Thanks, --Jerry in Michigan

On 11/18/2010 4:34 AM, Mike Fry wrote:
> On 2010/11/18 06:29, Chris Clifford wrote:
>
>> I am a new user of Legacy 7.  I understand the importance of entering
>> locations consistently; however, the instructions are for town, county,
>> state, country.  The majority of my ancestors are from England and a few
>> from
>> Canada.  How do I enter these locations, i.e., Lincoln, Lincolnshire,
>> England?  If so, isn't there a field missing as Lincolnshire is the
>> county,
>> but there isn't a state or province.  Also, what would be the correct
>> entry
>> for Canadian locations; can anyone give me an example?
> First of all - Ignore any recommendations in the documentation! And pay
> close
> attention to Ron Ferguson :-)
>
> This is all written from a USA point of view and the structure oft-quoted
> doesn't really apply to the UK way of doing things - and the rest of the
> world
> to be strictly accurate. Also, the 4-part location doesn't always fit with
> the
> historic way in which places were named. So, unless you're dead-set on
> using the
> Geo-Database - which only knows about modern names anyway - you are best
> to
> forget the 4-part thing.
>
> Having said that, I would still advocate the need for consistency to avoid
> unnecessary duplication of locations. I find with UK locations that there
> is a
> need sometimes to distinguish between actual places and general areas. For
> example, parishes that are usually known by the main church in that
> parish, and
> the civil registration districts. Add the occasional need for Hundreds,
> 'real'
> Counties and Poor-Law districts to be thrown into the mix, and it soon
> becomes
> obvious that the "One Size Fits All" approach of the Geo-Database and the
> 4-part
> USA location name, isn't applicable to the UK.
>
> I set my Registration Districts up according to a 3-part formula
>
> e.g. "RD: Walsingham, Norfolk, England" where RD is part of the name in
> order to
> distinguish between this area and the village of the same name. The
> short-form
> can simply be set to "Walsingham (RD)", with no need for the County or
> Country.
>
> Parishes, I simply name according to a 4-part format of
>
> <Church Name>,<Parish>,<County>,<Country>
>
> Oh yes! Apply the right-to-left sort as well.
>




Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Reply via email to