From: Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > So then you are saying that the right to property is > conditional. > Interesting position. Still not a libertarian one, but interesting > none the less. One would also have to wonder which other rights you > consider conditional - life maybe, or liberty? I am just curious. > > > > BWS > > > > > It's amazing how you consistantly attempt to put words in my mouth > that have absolutely nothing even remotely similar to anything I've > actually said and expect to get away with it. > > Please show me exactly where I said or even suggested that owning > property is conditional. Bringing property into America for the > purpose of selling it is conditional, owning it isn't.
If I own it I should be able to do with it what I choose, as long as I do not violate the equal rights of others. That is the right to property. To bring my property, that I own to a place to sell it, is my right. If I secure permission of the associated property owners, I am operating in a perfectly moral manner. If anyone interferes that is not involved in the transaction (such as the Mafia, terrorist or a government) then they are operating in an immoral manner. My right to dispose of my property in any way that does not transgress against the property rights of other INDIVIDUALS (caps for emphasis) is unconditional. There are no moral group rights or unless they have agreed to a partnership or have ownership specificly in common, no group property rights. Now if I owned an access to the ocean, a water right of way and a store on the land that was next to the ocean, MORALLY I could bring in anything I wished and sell it to whomever would buy it and no one not involved could morally interfere. It was your direct implication that I should need the permission of an uninvolved 3rd party to move my property on my property. And while that is the current law of the land, it is very very very wrong and immoral and very very un-libertarian and anti-liberty. And if you are not saying that it is a condition of me being able to move my property to receive permission from someone not involved to exercise my rights, then what are you saying? And what right do you have to tell me what i can and can't do with my property? And by what mechanism can you cede that non existent right to a government? BWS ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
