Actualy, I would agree with Paul, Iraq, including Sadam, was no more a danger to us in the US than Cambodia. The information put on the table was doctored, in the sense that key sentancies such as "We beleive the detainy is providing false information to mislead interrogaters." and "The detainy was never in a position to aquire this information."
Iraq was Bogus, and I wanted to scream at every one, but I was not in the country at the time. --- In [email protected], <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > There was no libertarian justification for the war in Iraq. There > > wasn't a threat in the slightest. There wasn't a danger. There > > wasn't any harm. There wasn't even a plan to harm us. There wasn't > > any connection with those who did harm us. > > > > America was in no more danger from Iraq than it was from Haiti or > > Cambodia. > > There is evidence to suggest otherwise. It is well documented and disseminated. Whether or not it is sufficient to warrant action is another question. I would argue that the current action is not warranted. But that Saddam and those in power in his government were a clear danger is not a very debatable point and action should have been taken on a more directed level. > > BWS > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
