The ports were and I suppose still are being managed or owned (I am
not sure which technically) by a British firm. Does the owner of
property or a business have a right to sell it to another person or
business concern without government approval?
$
--- In [email protected], "James Stevenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Voting against the ports deal is a very Libertarian thing to do.
Dubai Ports
> World is owned, through intermediary entities by the ruler of Dubai,
Sheikh
> Mohammed bin Rashid al-Maktoum. I have no problem banning any foreign
> government or dictator from owning anything in the United States. If
we are
> against U.S. government ownership, certainly foreign government
ownership
> should be banned.
> It's a case of doing the right thing, even if for the wrong reason.
>
>
>
> J R aka Vjklander
>
> If YOU voted for George Bush the Younger, YOU are personally
responsible for
> the deaths of 2547 American soldiers. Sleep Well.
> Those who voted for George Bush the Younger are morally inferior to
those
> Germans who voted for Hitler.
> Visit us (www.uniquewear.com)
> Vote Libertarian (www.lp.org)
> Support NCSF (www.ncsfreedom.org)
>
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
