I live in a right to work state but I don't work in a unionized
industry. I oppose right to work laws because they interfere with the
type of agreements employers and employees can enter in to. I support
a separation of economy and state. In a capitalist economy the state
would dictate which type of agrrements employers and employees can
enter in to. It is a matter of principle with me. I don't believe the
state should favor either the employer or employee in matters of
employement, benefits, wages, salaries, etc... or act as a arbitrator
in disputes between employees and employers. I don't see that as a
legitimate roll of the state.
$
--- In [email protected], "uncoolrabbit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Any one here working in a right-to-work state , preferably one working
> in a unionized industry, who could give there point of view on right-
> to-work legislation? I am from a state with out such legislation and I
> want a better perspective of the pro's and cons of such legislations,
> or lack of legislation, effect on economic growth, work force growth,
> saleries and unemployment.
>
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
