--- In [email protected], <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > That was on purpose. No force should be used for "credible threats", > > only for response to actual attacks. To do otherwise is not defense > > and is not libertarian. > > > It is defense and it is libertarian. To wait is stupid and tantamount to suicide. > > BWS ______________________________________________________________________
Boyd, Russia represents a credible threat to the United State. Is it stupid to sit idly by and not nuke them to remove such a credible threat. So does China and France and England and several other countries that have enough nuclear weapons and/or ground troops - and the means to deliver them - to destroy the United State. Do we nuke all of them? ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Home is just a click away. Make Yahoo! your home page now. http://us.click.yahoo.com/DHchtC/3FxNAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
