Ps. Mark, to continue with the post before, I want to add one thing.
No, it is not government welfair. Welfair is not a legal requirement. This
subsidy is a binding agreement between two nations. It is law. The money, as
little as it may be, is compensation for giving up tribal lands and
ancestrial ways of survival. Mutual agreement was signed into law.
Welfair is charity.
On 6/25/06, mark robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> John,
>
> If by "the current situation" you mean govt welfare, then the
> answer is number 3. Great elaboration as to how and why it is the
> best answer is contained in the paper (and in basic Libertarian
> principles). Briefly those consist of explaining that welfare
> stifles interest in business and innovation and work, and how
> stopping welfare increases said interest which then raises the
> standard of living by decreasing poverty through capitalism.
>
> -Mark
>
> PS: Thank-you for being more polite.
>
>
>
> ************
> {American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
> "not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
> case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
> There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
> unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
> its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
> unjust lawsuits.
> See www.fija.org
> [Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
>
> ----------------------
>
>
> >
> > You claim my position offers "no solutions or alternatives",
> but
> > that's only because it does not offer them in the form of
> > more/modified welfare handouts. You claim the paper is "all
> > bullshit" for the same reason: because it disagrees with your
> > notion that (modified?) welfare is the solution (to problems
> > caused by welfare).
> >
>
> Alright Mark, you tell me...without having to repeat all the
> facts, what do
> YOU suggest?
> 1. Leave the current situation in place.
>
> 2. Change it to something else.
>
> 3. Eliminate it and leave the people to fend for themselves.
>
> Please, if you choose to change it, HOW would you change it?
>
> If you can not answer that, this conversation is simply a moor
> example of
> mental masturbation.
>
>
>
--
*****************************************
"We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang
separately!" ...Ben Franklin
******************************************
Are YOU Preparing For The November '06 Elections NOW???
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups. See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/TISQkA/hOaOAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
