Enemies tend to be collectivist, so you can't avoid the evil word "they" when 
rationally discussing the problem.  The threat comes from armies or militant 
groups, and those are collectivist entities requiring collectivist defenses.  
Such defenses should be as voluntarily staffed and funded as is practical.

Since the LP platform does indeed call for some limited amount of government, 
it is just as guilty of "collectivist spouting" as I.  Perhaps the LP platform 
was written by collectivist infiltrators.  Let's replace the party platform by 
300 million individual platforms, one for each American.  I'll have my army, 
you have yours.  I think you can buy fighter jets at Toys 'R Us -- don't forget 
the glue.

As for the tax dollars, high taxation is one of my biggest gripes.  I'd like 
the federal government to do nothing more than provide essential security and 
justice as authorized by the Constitution.  To the extent that can be staffed 
and funded voluntarily, then fine.  But a bunch of individuals without a united 
military deterrent will soon be overrun by a collectivist army.


From: James Landrith 
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 5:17 PM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: RE: [Libertarian] Re: Stop the War FOR Terror


They who?

Why is there a collectivist spouting off in a libertarian forum?

This is very tiresome and quite silly.

Bob, why is the choice between spending money in Iraq and spending it on
welfare? Why not just stop stealing it from me and let me spend it how I
see fit?

Oh, that is the libertarian question. You'd rather ask the wrong questions.

Sorry, forgot who I was talking to..

--------------

James Landrith

http://www.linkedin.com/in/jlandrith

http://apus.facebook.com/profile.php?id=134400205

http://www.myspace.com/jlandrith

http://jameslandrith.com

http://multiracial.com

From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bob Giramma
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 5:12 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Libertarian] Re: Stop the War FOR Terror

I don't think anyone is talking about a war in Iran -- at least not like
that in Iraq. We now know that civilizing Middle East Muslims is as
difficult as herding cats -- but more violent. They are culturally incapable
of civilized government. 

The objectives with Iran would be 1) eliminate their nuclear weapons
program, and 2) make them pay a price for killing Americans and otherwise
disrupting life in Iraq. Just bomb the hell out of them, then leave. There's
plenty of sand for them to pound thereafter.

In response to your enumerated points below: 
1. The role of the US government / military is to serve the interests of
Americans, not Iraqis.
2. Every soldier in the US military is a volunteer who knew about Iraq prior
to his or her enlistment or last reenlistment.
3. Are you proposing to take the tax dollars spent on the military -- a
primary government institution -- and spend those dollars on welfare state
programs?

From: Wendie Slovak 
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 1:10 PM
To: [email protected] <mailto:Libertarian%40yahoogroups.com> 
Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Stop the War FOR Terror

I see no reason why we should go make a war in Iran. I think its
stupid were in Iraq still. The war pisses me off for a number of
reasons: 1.To many Iraq civilians have died. 2.To many people my age
and old are fighting in the war and have been killed. 3.We are wasting
our money when it could take care of people here.

Wendie 
__________________________________________________________
--- In [email protected] <mailto:Libertarian%40yahoogroups.com> ,
Emil R.Wolanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Stop the War FOR Terror
> 
> The Bush Administration is threatening war to stop Iran from
developing nuclear weapons. Such a war would drive more Muslims toward
terrorism. It would be a war for terrorism instead of a war against
terrorism. We should do in Iran what we should have done in Iraq. We
should return to our traditional policy of deterrence. Please join me
in asking Congress to pass a resolution opposing a Presidential attack
on Iran, and asking them to restore the traditional policy of
deterrence. You can do so by clicking here:
http://action.downsizedc.org/wyc.php?cid=54.
> 
> Thought I'd forward this on.
> 
> Come to DownsizeDC.org to learn more:
> http://action.downsizedc.org/wyc.php?cid=54
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to