I guess I don't understand why the util subproject is
a special case. If I'm not allowed to vote on the
Servlet API, why can Servlet API committers vote on my
library? Let's not start rewriting the rules, let's
just write some good software. If you really want a
stake in my library, monitor the mailing list, make a
contribution, and prove that it works. Giving a
non-contributor voting priveleges is contrary to the
Jakarta meritocracy. I'm willing to entertain the
notion of opening access to the whole Jakarta project,
but _not_ if only the util subproject is open.
--- "Ignacio J. Ortega" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Costin escribio :
>
> > How many commiters are listed in new-httpd commit
> file ? Do they have
> > chaos ?
>
> Why everybody assumes that giving 90 people access
> to the same
> repository with accurate & strict rules as usual
> btw, produces
> inherently Chaos?
>
> Given that this people is already responsable in one
> or more jakarta
> projects, and their interest ( or lack of it in the
> case but this people
> is not a problem thought :) in to maintain their
> respective projects
> runnning smoothly with a given component used on his
> or in others
> projects,
>
> In addition it seems there are projects with many
> more committers out
> there..
>
> What's the point in considering a big group as a
> irremediable chaos
> generator..?
>
> Saludos ,
> Ignacio J. Ortega
>
=====
Morgan Delagrange
Britannica.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices! http://auctions.yahoo.com/
