"Ignacio J. Ortega" wrote:
> Please please put up a proposal for a rule the library that no ones can
> veto a new package for the simple reason that there is one that does the
> same job, :)

Now that you mention it, we did ask that question initially, 

< http://husted.com/about/jakarta/lib002.htm >

but the response isn't strictly represented in the draft guidelines.
Most people did agree that overlap between components is acceptable, so
we might at least say:

"It is expected that the scope of packages may sometimes overlap."

-Ted.

Reply via email to